MeewnissippuL Kynd Typs KLasT By Syz Ohrdr Uhv SyehnTiffik Baysik Kyndz KLasT By Ohrdrd Syz


SaLvejd Fruhm Paeej: Municipal Kynd Typs


Municipal Core Laws In FuhnehTik IngLish Yeeng Voiss Sownd Chahrz


Wa STaeeT Lah InnishiTTiv Nuhmbr 502 FrsT Feew TekSTs

NexT TekST Wuhz Fruhm:

WashingTon STaeeT InnishiTTiv Mezhr Nuhmbr 502

PART I INTENT

NEW SECTION. Sec. 1.

The people intend to…try a new approach that:

(1) Allows law enforcement resources to be focused on violent and property crimes;

(2) Generates new state and local tax revenue for education, health care, research, and substance abuse prevention; and

(3)…Stop treating adult marijuana use as a crime…Takes marijuana out of the hands of illegal drug organizations and brings it under a tightly regulated, state-licensed system similar to that for controlling hard alcohol.


FrsT Fruhm: Washington State Law: Initiative Measure No 502 filed July 8, 2011

PART I INTENT

NEW SECTION. Section 1.

The people intend to…try a new approach that:
(1) Allows law enforcement resources to be focused on violent and property crimes;
(2) Generates new state and local tax revenue for education,
health care, research, and substance abuse prevention;
and
(3) Takes marijuana out of the hands of illegal drug organizations and brings it under a tightly regulated, state licensed system similar to that for controlling hard alcohol.


NexT Municipal Core Laws Fruhm:

RTh SihTihZen RyTs Uhv RTh Fed KonsTihTuushuhn And Meewnissipul Kohr Lahz

RTh SiTTizzen RyT 0: The inhabitants and citizens of Earth who are within the Federation of Earth shall have certain inalienable rights defined hereunder. It shall be mandatory for the World Parliament, the World Executive, and all organs and agencies of the World Government to honor, implement and enforce these rights, as well as for the national governments of all member nations in the Federation of Earth to do likewise. Individuals or groups suffering violation or neglect of such rights shall have full recourse through the World Ombudsmus, the Enforcement System and the World Courts for redress of grievances. The inalienable rights shall include the following:

RTh SiTTizzen RyT 1: Equal rights for all citizens of the Federation of Earth, with no discrimination on grounds of race, color, caste, nationality, sex, religion, political affiliation, property, or social status.

RTh SiTTizzen RyT 2: Equal protection and application of world legislation and world laws for all citizens of the Federation of Earth.

RTh SiTTizzen RyT 3: Freedom of thought and conscience, speech, press, writing, communication, expression, publication, broadcasting, telecasting, and cinema, except as an overt part of or incitement to violence, armed riot or insurrection.

RTh SiTTizzen RyT 4: Freedom of assembly, association, organization, petition and peaceful demonstration.

RTh SiTTizzen RyT 5: Freedom to vote without duress, and freedom for political organization and campaigning without censorship or recrimination.

RTh SiTTizzen RyT 6: Freedom to profess, practice and promote religious or religious beliefs or no religion or religious belief.

RTh SiTTizzen RyT 7: Freedom to profess and promote political beliefs or no political beliefs.

RTh SiTTizzen RyT 8: Freedom for investigation And research and reporting.

RTh SiTTizzen RyT 9: Freedom to travel without passport or visas or other forms of registration used to limit travel between, among or within nations.

RTh SiTTizzen RyT 10: Prohibition against slavery, peonage, involuntary servitude, and conscription of labor.

RTh SiTTizzen RyT 11: Prohibition against military conscription.

RTh SiTTizzen RyT 12: Safety of person from arbitrary or unreasonable arrest, detention, exile, search or seizure; Requirement of warrants for searches and arrests. [ See: Peeuur JusT WohrehnTs Fohr Srch AkTs And UhrehsTs ]

RTh SiTTizzen RyT 13: Prohibition against physical or psychological duress or torture during any period of investigation, arrest, detention or imprisonment, and against cruel or unusual punishment.

RTh SiTTizzen RyT 14: Right of habeas corpus; no ex-post-facto laws; Vrss 0: no double jeopardy; right to refuse self-incrimination or the incrimination of another.

RTh SiTTizzen RyT 15: Prohibition against private armies and paramilitary organizations as being threats to the common peace and safety.

RTh SiTTizzen RyT 16: Safety of property from arbitrary seizure; protection against exercise of the power of eminent domain without reasonable compensation.

RTh SiTTizzen RyT 17: Right to family planning and free public assistance to achieve family planning objectives.

RTh SiTTizzen RyT 18: Right of privacy of person, family and association; prohibition against surveillance as a means of political control.


Pure JusT WarrenTs For Searches And ArresTs

Peeuur JusT WohrehnTs Fohr Srch AkTs And UhrehsTs

RTh SiTTizzen RyT 12:1: Safety of person from arbitrary or unreasonable arrest, detention, exile, search or seizure;

RTh SiTTizzen RyT 12:2:0: ReekwyrmehnT Uhv WohrehnTs Fohr Srch AkTs And UhrehsTs.

RTh SiTTizzen RyT 12:2:1:0: Thehr Ahr SimpLee Now 2 Lrnd JusT Reezuhnz Fohr Uh Srch WohrehnT.

RTh SiTTizzen RyT 12:2:1:1: If { Ther Wuhz Uh SeLf giltee Uhv AkTeeng OwT Uh Kung Fu FyT Skill Typ Deskrybd Az uhtak With Wuhn wehpuhn tuul Ohr mohr than wuhn wehpuhn tuulz that myt ( hahrm = ( { injur ( Uh Lyv BeesT WiTH Wrkeeng Nrvz ) } ohr|and { dammejyz ( Uh Muhsheen WiTh Wrkeeng EeLekTronniks ) } leeveeng uh ( hahrmd = ( injurd wuund ohr damajd damaj ) ) that kozd Less Fuhngkshuhn Uhv ThaT Wrkeeng Tek } ThaT Wuhz Pruuvd By ( FohToh Ohr|And Vid Ohr|And [ Uh hahrmd VikTim'z Reekohrded STaeeTmenT ] Ohr|And [ Uh WiTness'z Reekohrded STaeeTmenT ] ) Ehvihdehnss Pruuveeng ThaT an ObjekTiv hahrm uhsult vyohlaeeshuhn krym uhkrd } Then ThaT krym Ehvihdehnss Shood GeT Eeuuzd Az Baeesis Fohr Uh ** WohrehnT Fohr JusT Seezhur Uhv [ Eech And Ehvree ] hahrm uhsult wehpuhn Uhv Thuh spehsiffik [ typ ohr typs ] pruuvd tu hav got eewzd tu kuhmit thuh hahrm uhsult krym**.

RTh SiTTizzen RyT 12:2:1:2: If Ther Iz A Self Huu Iz InnuhsenT Uhv hahrm-wehpuhn-uhsult with ThaT SehLf's JusTLee Uhkwyrd Tu Ohn ProppurTee Wich got unreezuhnuhbullee ahrbitrehrihlee theft seezd Then ThaT theft rongd InnuhsenT SeLF MyT LisT [ Eech And Ehvree ] theft stohld AeeTem And SpehsihfihkuLLee How ThaT AeeTem Wuhz JusTLee Uhkwyred, PreefurruhbLee WiTh uh ReeseeT. THaT JusT[[Lee]]] Uhkwyrd LisT ReepohrT Shood GeT InvesTihgaeeTed Tu Vehrihfy THuh Degree Uhv ITs VaLLihdihTee Then Tu Thuh Degree VaLidaeeTed Eeuuzd Az Thuh Baeesis Fohr Thuh Ishuuanss Uhv Uh WohrehnT Fohr Reezuhnd JusT Seezhur Uhv ThefT STohL ProprTee

RTh SiTTizzen RyT 12:3:0: Ther Ahr Now 2 Lrnd JusT Reezuhnz Fohr An UhrehsT WohrehnT:

RTh SiTTizzen RyT 12:3:1: Thuh FrsT Iz Tu Az Suun Az PossihbuL STop Uhv hahrm uhsult vyohlaeeshuhn krym And Therby PreevenT Thuh kuhnTihnuueeng uhv hahrm uhsult krym akts;

RTh SiTTizzen RyT 12:3:2:0: Thuh Sehkuhnd Iz If Wen ( { uh pland mrdr } ohr {multi pland mrdrz } ) haz uhkrd Then Shood InvesTihgaeeshuhn Syenss Branch Kyndz Deskrybd Az DeeTekTiv Fohrenzikss PrakTiss AkTss Uhkr ReezuLTeeng WiTh HohpfuLLee UhresTeeng { theft and|ohr uhsuLt and|ohr mrdr } suspektss.


DeeTekTiv Fohrenzikss Branch Kyndz Deskrybd AT https://www.thebalancecareers.com/detective-and-criminal-investigator-job-information-974467 fohr UhresTing { theft and|ohr uhsuLt and|ohr mrdr } suspects:

RTh SiTTizzen RyT 12:3:2:1: ( ThefT & UhsuLT & MrdR ) krym PLaeess InvesTihgaeeshuhn
RTh SiTTizzen RyT 12:3:2:2: Evidence collection
RTh SiTTizzen RyT 12:3:2:3: AhTopsee
RTh SiTTizzen RyT 12:3:2:4: WiTness Intrveewz
RTh SiTTizzen RyT 12:3:2:5: ReepohrT RyTeeng
RTh SiTTizzen RyT 12:3:2:6: Record keeping
RTh SiTTizzen RyT 12:3:2:7: Writing probable cause affidavits
RTh SiTTizzen RyT 12:3:2:8: Preparing arrest warrants
RTh SiTTizzen RyT 12:3:2:9: Courtroom testimony
RTh SiTTizzen RyT 12:3:2:10: Preparing and executing search warrants
RTh SiTTizzen RyT 12:3:2:11: UhresTeeng ( ThefT And|AiThr UhsuLT And|AiThr Mrdr ) SuspekTs
RTh SiTTizzen RyT 12:3:2:12: KohrT Fohrenziks TryuL
RTh SiTTizzen RyT 12:3:2:13: KohrT Jurree { DeeLibraeeshuhnz Then KuhnkLuuzhuhnz }
RTh SiTTizzen RyT 12:3:2:14: KohrT Juj Adjuudihkaeeshuhn
RTh SiTTizzen RyT 12:3:2:15: Krym SuhspekT { PeenuLyzd PehnuLTee And|Ohr ReeLeesT }


RTh SiTTizzen RyT 12:3:2:16:0: Krym PehnuLTeez InkLuud:

RTh SiTTizzen RyT 12:3:2:16:1:0: Ishuu Peeuur JusT WahrenT Tu:

RTh SiTTizzen RyT 12:3:2:16:1:1: Seez Theef ThefT STohL Suudoh-ProprTee

RTh SiTTizzen RyT 12:3:2:16:1:2: And|AeeThr Uhsess STohL ProprTee WrTh Az Neg DeT BaLLanss Uhv Nuu DeT UhkownT Uhv Hyrd DeT KohLehkshuhn Aeejehnsee Tu GradjuuaLLee RehgeeuuLrLee KohLehkT DeT PaeemehnTs Tu GeT Fohrwrded Tu STohL Fruhm VikTim.
RTh SiTTizzen RyT 12:3:2:16:1:3: And|AeeThr Seez Ohprehsohr Ohprehshuhn Hahrm UhsuLT Wehpuhn Ohr Wehpuhnz

RTh SiTTizzen RyT 12:3:2:16:1:4: And|AeeThr Koz Eech Pruuvd UhsuLT Ohpressohr And Eech KuhnvikTed Mrdrur Tu Bee { Took Tu Then PuT In Then LokT In } JaeeL Fohr:

RTh SiTTizzen RyT 12:3:2:16:1:4:1: And|AeeThr A ShohrT Peereeuhd Fohr Wuhn uhsult krym
RTh SiTTizzen RyT 12:3:2:16:1:4:2: And|AeeThr A Mohr Long Peereuhd Fohr muLty-uhsuLt tohrchr Ohpreshuhn
RTh SiTTizzen RyT 12:3:2:16:1:4:3: Ohr Fohr Thuh ResT Uhv Thuh LyfTym Fohr A deelihbureht mrdrur konvikt kuhnvikted Uhv less mrdrz Than ( DuhbuL Thuh GLohbuL Nuhmbr Uhv spureeuhss kuhnvikshuhnz uhv wuhn IhnuhsenT SuspekT uhv deeLihbureht mrdr ).

RTh SiTTizzen RyT 12:3:2:16:1:5: Ohr If Uh DeeLihburehT Mass-Mrdrur KonvikT Wuhz KuhnvikTed Uhv ( duhbul thuh GLohbuL nuhmbr uhv spureeuhss kuhnvikshuhnz uhv wuhn IhnuhsenT SuspekT uhv deeLihburehT mrdr ) then shood issuu uh deth wahrehnt tu koz that Wuhn PLuss duhbuL GLohbuL spureeuhss mass mrdrurz kovikt tu get put in a min kruuehl leethul eeLehktrik chehr that wehn trnd on duz koz min suhfreeng then leest suun deth.


Intimmuhsee Prefss

Human UniTed Nations Reespekted SexuaL Orientations


Table of Contents

This ScripT Iz Proh "OpshuhnuL KuhnsenT Tu ( Wuhn Ohr Sum Nevr AhL ) WahnT(s)"!!!


InTihmusee Prefs** Ahr ( AbsTinnehnss Optss Ohr Fanntuhsee Optss Ohr Mrj Optss Ohr Fuk Optss )


AbsTinnehnss

Iz Fohnehtik Eeng-Glish Voeess Sownd Synz

Fohr Wrd Nohrm Speld "Abstinence"

Uhv InTihmuhsee Prefs Uhv Lyf Izm Kynd Typs Ohrdrd By Syz

An AbsTinance IsT Now Non Duz Sum Theeng Ohr Theengz:

1: Maybee Lyk Non-Fantasyz UhbowT Beeyeeng Neer ( 1 Ohr Multi ) Lihveeng ( Beest(s) EspeshuLLee Human(s) )

2: And Maybee Lyk Non-PuT A Mem Uhv ( 1 Pahrt Ohr Multi-Pahrts ) Dif Liveeng ( Beest Esp. Human ) Bod In ( 1 Pahrt Ohr Multi-Pahrts ) Uhv 1'z Self-Bod

3: And Maybee Lyk With ( Pahrt Ohr Ahl ) Uhv ( Self-bod And|Ohr Dif-Lyv-Self-Bod ) __ Now __Non-( Fuk = Fuck )-Intuu ( Uh Pahrt Ohr Ahl ) Uhv Uh Dif-Lyv-Self-Bod (Such Az ( Lyf Dik Ohr Tek DiLdoh Ohr Klit Ohr Lyf ( Vajjynuh = Vagina ) Ohr { ( Ahrtiffishul Vajynuh = Artificial vagina ).

Self Myt Hohpfullee ( Non-Fantasyz And Non-PuT-A-Mem-In And Non-( Fuk = Fuck )** ) Pree Min 1 Uhv Thuh Followeeng:

**Pree Praktisseeng

1:1: " Ahr Yuu Sik WiTh Ehnee ( Disease = Diss-Eez )? "

1:2: " *Duu Yuu Hav* Ehnee snot grohn Fruhm Fluu Vyruhss Ohr Fruhm Smohkeeng? "__

1:3.1: " Duu Yuu Hav __ ( S T D = { Sex Tranzmitubul Diss-Eez = ( Sexually Transmitable Disease ) } ) Jrmz__? "

1:3:2: Yuu Myt Chuuz Tu Dreem,

  • " If 1 Iz Neg ( Nehvr Had 1 Uhv Thuh S T D Kyndz )
    • " Tho Thuh Uhthr Iz Poz ( Haz Min 1 Uhv Thuh S T D Kyndz "
  • Ohr " If Bohth Hav Ehnee Dif Numbr Uhv S T D Kyndz "
    • " Then it Iz Non-Needed Tu Reeveel Ehnee Mohr S T D Infoh. "

1:3:3: " Duu Yuuu Need Tu Yuuz { See https://www.datingpositives.com }? "

1:3: " Duu Yuu Hav Ehnee ( cuhntaeegion = contagion ) Ohr Ehnee Uhthr Intihmuhsee-Spred Suffreeng? "

1:4: " Will U Deskryb Min 1 Uhv Yohr InTihmusee Prefs** Az ( Dreem Prefss Ohr Mrj Prefss Ohr Fuk Prefss )? "

2: And Pree Ther Kuhnsent Tu ( 1 Ohr Multi ) Uhv Thuh Intihmuhsee PrefsAz ( Dreem Prefss Ohr Mrj Prefss Ohr Fuk Prefss )

3: And Mohst Impohrtantlee Aftr Ther Non0kuhnsent Tu ( 1 Ohr Multi ) Uhv Thuh Intihmuhsee Prefs Az ( Dreem Prefss Ohr Mrj Prefss Ohr Fuk Prefss ).


Baeesik Intihmuhsee Prefs:

A HeTerosexuaL IsT, A.K.A. HeT MaiT ) Now This Wuhn Tym GeTs Ohr Tend Tu Suhm Tymz GeT ) InTimmaT Ohr ( Now FLesh Duz Ohr Dreemz Uhv Ohr Theengks Uhv ) InTimmassee wiTh Wuhn Ohr Mohr BeesTs Uhv A Dif Jendr.

HomosexuaLz ( A.K.A. Gayz Ohr Saym SexT MayTs ) now { Duhz Ohr TheengksUv Ohr { Free Lee LeTs } } Sex WiTh Thuh Saym Jendr.

Gay, Wich iz ( Lez Galz Ohr Fag Gyz) In A ( Simp Gay Pehr Ohr Grwp Uhv Gayz ).

If Thuh Gay Ohr UhThr MaiTs Ahr OpshuhnuL KuhnsenT IsTs And Pref Tu Non Skin Trez And Tu Non Rape, Then Less Than Wuhn Shaym SkripT AhThohryzd Twohrdz Ther Iz Good Norm Hab Tu Rep Task Aiz And Tu Teech UhThrz Fohr Ther ATTiTTwdz Twohrdz Thohz Good MaiTs.

A Bisexual MaiT, Ohr Simp Li Bi, now Duhz, Dreemz Ohr Theengks Uhv InTimmassee wiTh 2 Dif SexT BeesTs.

Simp HeT InTimmuhsee Iz Wuhn Gy BeesT And Wuhn GaL BeesT Hw Suhm Tymz DaiT, MaiT And|Ohr Maybee Wed Aiz, And They MyT OpT Tu Uhgree Tu ModdesTee Ohr Tu AkT Az InTimmaT BeesTs.

Gy Mohr HeT InTimmuhsee Iz Wuhn Gy Now WiTh Mohr Than Wuhn GaL Hw Ahr Now AiThr OpshuhnaL Li InTimmaT, Grwp MaiTs And|Ohr Maybee Wed Aizd And A.K.A. Polygyny. Sum Tymz A GaL In A Polygynous Grwp MyT OpT Tu AkT Lez Ohr Bi.

GaL Mohr HeT InTimmuhsee Izm Iz Wun GaL WiTh Mohr Than Wuhn Gy Hw Ahr Now AiThr OpshuhnaL Li InTimmaT, A MaTe Grwp Ohr Wed Aizd, A.K.A. Polyandry. Sum Tymz A Gy In A Polyandrous GrwP MyT OpT Tu AkT Suhm Tymz Fag Ohr Bi.

HermafrodiTe in Simp Lang Iz Maf.

Gay Mafs kan geT kahLd a Maf pehr ohr a Maf Grwp.

A Trisexual A.K.A. Wuhn WiTh [[[Three Dif Djendrd ImTimmaT PahrTnrz]] Now Theengks Uhv, Dreemz Uhv Ohr Duhz InTimmassee WiTh EgzakT Li Three Djendrz.

Momogamy iz having and Luving jusT wun sex parTner or spowss.

Polyamory iz luveeng mohr Than wun uThr dring Thuh saym Tym.

Polygamy Iz Having Mohr Than Wun Sex ParTnr or Spowss, ideally wiTh As SmahL UmounT Uv jealousy Az PossibL.

Serial Monogamy iz having wun parTnr dring a Tym ( in seekwenss ohr Taking Trnz ) ahr The mosT common wayz uv Polygamy.

An Ohrjee iz when 3 ohr mohr fohk uhgree Tu hav sex wiTh eech uhThr.


PrsuhnaL Spaiss Iz Wun'z ( Aura = Mag FeeLd ).

( Mohr Fahr Uhway Frum Self Bod ) Iz ( Less PrsuhnuL Spayss ).

Wen U FrsT See An UThr Prsuhn, IT Iz kuhnsidraT and PoLiTe Tu:

1: MenTalyThink Uv ThaT Prsuhn Az:
* Non-inTihmaT (STranger=STraindjr)
* ( Lyf Ohr Tek ) ChyLd Uhv
* ( Thuh Now Tranz FynyT Mynd = Thuh ALL ParenT ).

2: Non-PuT In Ohr Neer Thuh UThr Prsuhn'z Bod A Dreemd KLohn Uhv Wuhn'z SeLf Bod.

3: PrakTiss Wun Uv Thuh ( Civil RighTs = SihviL RyTs ) Tu Try Tu REED Lrn:
3.1 Maybee Wuhn Ohr Suhm Uhv Ther InTresT(s),
3.2: Maybee Ther ( ( Sepraishuhn Vrsuhs ( InTihnassee = ( InSyd Mag FeeLd ) ) Pref ),

4. If Wuhn Ohr BeTr Mohr Uhv ThaT Wuhn'z MayBee Shehrd InTresTs And|Ohr InTihmuhsee Prefs Ahr KumpaTTibL WiTh A ( Dreem Ohr UhThr AkT ), Then MayBee Ask Prmishuhn Tu Dreem ThaT KuhmpaTibL Dreem Ohr Doo ThaT KuhmpaTibL UhThr AkT.

Eech Uv Thuh InTihmuhsee Prefs Ahr Sum Tymz ( { NachruL Lee WahnTEd} Ohr { Suhm Tymz KonchusLee Chohz} Ohr { Sum Tymz PahrT ToT Tu Ohr PahrT Lrnd By Wuhn Hw Haz Non YeT KompreehendEd A PahrT Uhv ThaT InTihmuhsee Pref), Tho Eech PahrT Uv Eech Uhv Thuh InTihmuhsee Prefs Shoud Nevr Bee ThoT Uv Az MandiTory or ObLigaTory Tu Lrn Ohr Chooz Tu AkT.


Sex Prefs Uhv InTihmuhsee Prefs

Sex Prefs Deskrybd

A HeTerosexuaL IsT, A.K.A. HeT MaiT ) Now This Wuhn Tym GeTs Ohr Tend Tu Suhm Tymz GeT ) InTimmaT Ohr ( Now FLesh Duz Ohr Dreemz Uhv Ohr Theengks Uhv ) InTimmassee wiTh Wuhn Ohr Mohr BeesTs Uhv A Dif Jendr.

HomosexuaLz ( A.K.A. Gayz Ohr Saym SexT MayTs ) now { Duhz Ohr TheengksUv Ohr { Free Lee LeTs } } Sex WiTh Thuh Saym Jendr.

Gay, Wich iz ( Lez Galz Ohr Fag Gyz) In A ( Simp Gay Pehr Ohr Grwp Uhv Gayz ).

If Thuh Gay Ohr UhThr MaiTs Ahr OpshuhnuL KuhnsenT IsTs And Pref Tu Non Skin Trez And Tu Non Rape, Then Less Than Wuhn Shaym SkripT AhThohryzd Twohrdz Ther Iz Good Norm Hab Tu Rep Task Aiz And Tu Teech UhThrz Fohr Ther ATTiTTwdz Twohrdz Thohz Good MaiTs.

A Bisexual MaiT, Ohr Simp Li Bi, now Duhz, Dreemz Ohr Theengks Uhv InTimmassee wiTh 2 Dif SexT BeesTs.

Simp HeT InTimmuhsee Iz Wuhn Gy BeesT And Wuhn GaL BeesT Hw Suhm Tymz DaiT, MaiT And|Ohr Maybee Wed Aiz, And They MyT OpT Tu Uhgree Tu ModdesTee Ohr Tu AkT Az InTimmaT BeesTs.

Gy Mohr HeT InTimmuhsee Iz Wuhn Gy Now WiTh Mohr Than Wuhn GaL Hw Ahr Now AiThr OpshuhnaL Li InTimmaT, Grwp MaiTs And|Ohr Maybee Wed Aizd And A.K.A. Polygyny. Sum Tymz A GaL In A Polygynous Grwp MyT OpT Tu AkT Lez Ohr Bi.

GaL Mohr HeT InTimmuhsee Izm Iz Wun GaL WiTh Mohr Than Wuhn Gy Hw Ahr Now AiThr OpshuhnaL Li InTimmaT, A MaTe Grwp Ohr Wed Aizd, A.K.A. Polyandry. Sum Tymz A Gy In A Polyandrous GrwP MyT OpT Tu AkT Suhm Tymz Fag Ohr Bi.

HermafrodiTe in Simp Lang Iz Maf.

Gay Mafs kan geT kahLd a Maf pehr ohr a Maf Grwp.

A Trisexual A.K.A. Wuhn WiTh [[[Three Dif Djendrd ImTimmaT PahrTnrz]] Now Theengks Uhv, Dreemz Uhv Ohr Duhz InTimmassee WiTh EgzakT Li Three Djendrz.

If 2 Ohr Mohr BeesTs Uv Ehnee KumpaTTibL UhgreemenT IsT InTimmuhsee Prefs ( And If Eech Uhv Them Non-Haz S.T.D.'z Ohr Eech Uhv Them Haz Thuh Saym STD[z] { See hTTps://www.daTingposiTives.com } ) WahnT Tu MeeT and ( DaTe And|Ohr MayT ) And Then ( EeThr { End Their RelaTionship } Ohr ( Uhgree Tu Wed ) Ohr { JusT Remain OpTionally InTihmaT WiTh Eech UhThr Az Long Az Iz HeLThee And Can LasT} ), Then UhThr FoLk ShouLd Non-Shame Thohz KuhmpaTibL UhgreemenT IsTs.


Phile Vrsuhs EroTica

Phile Vrsuhs Erotica

Phile

-phile ETymoLogy

also -phil, word-forming element meaning "one that loves, likes, or is attracted to," via French -phile and Medieval Latin -philus in this sense, from Greek -philos, common suffix in personal names (such as Theophilos), from philos "loving, friendly, dear; related, own," related to philein "to love," which is of unknown origin.

See: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Category:English_words_suffixed_with_-phile

EroTica In FuhnehTik IngLish Yeeng Voiss Sownd Chahrz Iz EeroTTikuh.

Erotica Dehfihnishuhn

Erotica is any artistic work that deals substantively with erotically stimulating or sexually arousing subject matter. All forms of art may depict erotic content, including painting, sculpture, photography, drama, film, music or literature. Erotica has high-art aspirations, differentiating it from commercial pornography.


PrsuhnaL Spaiss Iz Wun'z ( Aura = Mag FeeLd ).

( Mohr Fahr Uhway Frum Self Bod )

  • Iz ( Less PrsuhnuL Spayss ).

Wen U FrsT See An UThr Prsuhn, IT Iz kuhnsidraT and PoLiTe Tu:

1: MenTalyThink Uv ThaT Prsuhn Az:
* Non-inTihmaT (STranger=STraindjr)
* ( Lyf Ohr Tek ) ChyLd Uhv
* ( Thuh Now Tranz FynyT Mynd = Thuh ALL ParenT ).

2: Non-PuT In Ohr Neer Thuh UThr Prsuhn'z Bod A Dreemd KLohn Uhv Wuhn'z SeLf Bod.

3: PrakTiss Wun Uv Thuh ( Civil RighTs = SihviL RyTs ) Tu Try Tu REED Lrn:
3.1 Maybee Wuhn Ohr Suhm Uhv Ther InTresT(s),
3.2: Maybee Ther ( ( Sepraishuhn Vrsuhs ( InTihnassee = ( InSyd Mag FeeLd ) ) Pref ),

4. If Wuhn Ohr BeTr Mohr Uhv ThaT Wuhn'z MayBee Shehrd InTresTs And|Ohr InTihmuhsee Prefs Ahr KumpaTTibL WiTh A ( Dreem Ohr UhThr AkT ), Then MayBee Ask Prmishuhn Tu Dreem ThaT KuhmpaTibL Dreem Ohr Doo ThaT KuhmpaTibL UhThr AkT.

Eech Uv Thuh InTihmuhsee Prefs Ahr Sum Tymz ( { NachruL Lee WahnTEd} Ohr { Suhm Tymz KonchusLee Chohz} Ohr { Sum Tymz PahrT ToT Tu Ohr PahrT Lrnd By Wuhn Hw Haz Non YeT KompreehendEd A PahrT Uhv ThaT InTihmuhsee Pref), Tho Eech PahrT Uv Eech Uhv Thuh InTihmuhsee Prefs Shoud Nevr Bee ThoT Uv Az MandiTory or ObLigaTory Tu Lrn Ohr Chooz Tu AkT.


Suhm InTihmuhsee Prefs

A HeTerosexuaL IsT, A.K.A. HeT MaiT ) Now This Wuhn Tym GeTs Ohr Tend Tu Suhm Tymz GeT ) InTimmaT Ohr ( Now FLesh Duz Ohr Dreemz Uhv Ohr Theengks Uhv ) InTimmassee wiTh Wuhn Ohr Mohr BeesTs Uhv A Dif Jendr.

HomosexuaLz ( A.K.A. Gayz Ohr Saym SexT MayTs ) now { Duhz Ohr TheengksUv Ohr { Free Lee LeTs } } Sex WiTh Thuh Saym Jendr.

Gay, Wich iz ( Lez Galz Ohr Fag Gyz) In A ( Simp Gay Pehr Ohr Grwp Uhv Gayz ).

If Thuh Gay Ohr UhThr MaiTs Ahr OpshuhnuL KuhnsenT IsTs And Pref Tu Non Skin Trez And Tu Non Rape, Then Less Than Wuhn Shaym SkripT AhThohryzd Twohrdz Ther Iz Good Norm Hab Tu Rep Task Aiz And Tu Teech UhThrz Fohr Ther ATTiTTwdz Twohrdz Thohz Good MaiTs.

A Bisexual MaiT, Ohr Simp Li Bi, now Duhz, Dreemz Ohr Theengks Uhv InTimmassee wiTh 2 Dif SexT BeesTs.

Simp HeT InTimmuhsee Iz Wuhn Gy BeesT And Wuhn GaL BeesT Hw Suhm Tymz DaiT, MaiT And|Ohr Maybee Wed Aiz, And They MyT OpT Tu Uhgree Tu ModdesTee Ohr Tu AkT Az InTimmaT BeesTs.

Gy Mohr HeT InTimmuhsee Iz Wuhn Gy Now WiTh Mohr Than Wuhn GaL Hw Ahr Now AiThr OpshuhnaL Li InTimmaT, Grwp MaiTs And|Ohr Maybee Wed Aizd And A.K.A. Polygyny. Sum Tymz A GaL In A Polygynous Grwp MyT OpT Tu AkT Lez Ohr Bi.

GaL Mohr HeT InTimmuhsee Izm Iz Wun GaL WiTh Mohr Than Wuhn Gy Hw Ahr Now AiThr OpshuhnaL Li InTimmaT, A MaTe Grwp Ohr Wed Aizd, A.K.A. Polyandry. Sum Tymz A Gy In A Polyandrous GrwP MyT OpT Tu AkT Suhm Tymz Fag Ohr Bi.

HermafrodiTe in Simp Lang Iz Maf.

Gay Mafs kan geT kahLd a Maf pehr ohr a Maf Grwp.

A Trisexual A.K.A. Wuhn WiTh [[[Three Dif Djendrd ImTimmaT PahrTnrz]] Now Theengks Uhv, Dreemz Uhv Ohr Duhz InTimmassee WiTh EgzakT Li Three Djendrz.

Momogamy iz having and Luving jusT wun sex parTner or spowss.

Polyamory iz luveeng mohr Than wun uThr dring Thuh saym Tym.

Polygamy Iz Having Mohr Than Wun Sex ParTnr or Spowss, ideally wiTh As SmahL UmounT Uv jealousy Az PossibL.

Serial Monogamy iz having wun parTnr dring a Tym ( in seekwenss ohr Taking Trnz ) ahr The mosT common wayz uv Polygamy.

An Ohrjee iz when 3 ohr mohr fohk uhgree Tu hav sex wiTh eech uhThr.


Phile Vrsuhs Erotica

Phile

-phile ETymoLogy

also -phil, word-forming element meaning "one that loves, likes, or is attracted to," via French -phile and Medieval Latin -philus in this sense, from Greek -philos, common suffix in personal names (such as Theophilos), from philos "loving, friendly, dear; related, own," related to philein "to love," which is of unknown origin.

See: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Category:English_words_suffixed_with_-phile

EroTica In FuhnehTik IngLish Yeeng Voiss Sownd Chahrz Iz EeroTTikuh.

Erotica Dehfihnishuhn

Erotica is any artistic work that deals substantively with erotically stimulating or sexually arousing subject matter. All forms of art may depict erotic content, including painting, sculpture, photography, drama, film, music or literature. Erotica has high-art aspirations, differentiating it from commercial pornography.

Thuh NeksT KonsepTs Ahr In Thuh Paeej AT

Proh Kuhnsent Ehtikkeht And Non raeep

Table of Contents

Thuh Paeej Naeemd " Kuhnsent Ehtikkeht "


Thuh NekST KonsepTs Ahr Fruhm:

Asking for permission is social etiquette

Do you remember, we learned about social etiquette and that we must say please and thank you? Well, asking for permission, before we touch or use something that doesn’t belong to us, is also social etiquette…

Did we ask our friend or relative, if we may touch or play with their things?

To ask to use or touch something, or even enter a room is called Asking for Permission. Sometimes people don’t like it and may even get upset, if you touch their things. Your friend may even fight with you and not speak to you. Because they may feel they are being taken for granted…

So, remember to ask for permission the next time!


Thuh NekST KonsepTs Ahr Fruhm:

Rejection vs. Objection

Rejection is derived from reject and rejected. The American Heritage Dictionary defines rejected as: To refuse to accept, submit to, believe, or make use of.

In the [reespect] profession we define a rejection as a definite “NO.” The prospect is not going to buy from you – ever.

Objection is derived from object and objecting. The same American Heritage Dictionary defines objection as: A reason or argument offered in disagreement, opposition, refusal, or disapproval.

In the [hope] profession we define an objection as a definite “Maybe.” The prospect isn’t ready to buy because you haven’t covered their concerns or you haven’t met some of their demands.


Thuh NekST Genralized KonsepTs Ahr Fruhm:

Informed Refusal vs. Informed Consent

posted by Kathy Everitt on Tuesday, October 11, 2016

Is your…[practice] giving informed refusal the same amount of consideration as informed consent?

Informed consent is a topic which is talked about frequently. It is through the informed consent discussion that a [Proffessional] educates [clients] on a recommended [behavior]. This conversation gives [Proffessionals] a unique opportunity to build rapport and trust with [clients].

The components of informed consent include a discussion about the risks, benefits and alternatives of a proposed [behavior]. After the discussion, [proffessionals] have [clients sign a document confirming they have had this discussion and have been given the opportunity to ask and have their questions answered.

If a [Proffessional] fails to obtain proper informed consent prior to rendering treatment they may be accused of negligence or battery, and could be sued for failing to provide information regarding complications.

When it comes to informed refusal and patients electing to forego recommended treatment plans, are you giving the same considerations that you would give in cases of informed consent?

The July 2015 issue of the Healthcare Risk Management Review has an excellent article on informed refusal. The article describes a situation where a patient refused to take a prescribed medicine and offers insight on how a conversation may lead to a better understanding of the underlying issues in cases of refusal or noncompliance.


Thuh NekST Genralized KonsepTs Ahr Fruhm:

Effective informed refusal

The informed refusal discussion with the [Client] is a good opportunity to find out if the individual really understands the consequences of his or her choice. Moreover, when used effectively, the discussion may tease out the real reasons for the [Client] declining a test or treatment.

Some care providers are reluctant to engage the [Client] in such a discussion. They do not want to appear to be bullying or browbeating the patient by asking “why” he or she has chosen not to pursue recommended [behavior].

With [ a Client ], the…practitioner might have continued the conversation by saying, “I am curious why you have decided not to use the [ proposed proposition ]” or “Could you help me understand why you do not want to take the [ proposed proposition ]?”

Alternatively, the [Professional] practitioner might say, “Before you firm up your decision, I would like you to spend a few minutes discussing your choice [ regarding proposed proposition ]…”…

At this stage, [ the Proffessional ] has a good opportunity to use a stylized “teach-back” approach to affirm that the [ Client comprehends ] the consequences of declining recommended [recomendation]. However, in approaching the [client] he should be respectful and [considerate] without trying to intimidate [ the Client ] into changing his mind.

Consider this example of the follow-up discussion.

“Hello [ Client name ]. I am pleased that you came back for your follow-up visit. The [Professopmal] practitioner tells me that you decided…to [ non doo ] the [ reccummended reccumendation ]. It will be helpful for me to understand why you have made this decision.”

The [Proffessional] then asks a series of questions and gives the [Client] time to respond.

Tell me what you recall of our discussion about the reason for [Proposing] this [proposition].

What do you remember about the probable benefits and risks of this course of [behavior]? …

We discussed what the consequences might be if you declined to [doo] the [proposition]. Can you tell me what might occur? …

[Doo] you recall [ Lrning about behavior ] alternatives?


Included page "ehtikkeht-wrd-deskripshuhn" does not exist (create it now)


Table of Contents

Kuhnsent Wrd Deskripshuhn


Thuh NekST KonsepTs Ahr Fruhm:

How to Teach Consent to Kids in 5 Simple Steps

February 26, 2015 by Michelle Dominique Burk…

Why Kids Should Start Learning About Consent ASAP

The way consent has been framed for most children — in cases where it is explicitly addressed — is that we tell kids something along the lines of “If someone says ‘no,’ then you need to listen to them.”

While this is an important lesson, it is normally as far as the discussion goes.

And simply couching all aspects of consent into this one no-means-no phrasing misses several key components of consent that are essential for kids to learn and employ as they start developing interpersonal relationships.

Discussing consent with a child in only this way proposes that “no” is the only form of non-consent available. This isn’t true, and when children learn about consent in this way, they can grow up with a sense of ambiguity about what constitutes consent.

Because discussing all aspects that encompass boundaries and consent can seem incredibly overwhelming – especially when trying to explain them to a child – many adults shy away from talking to kids about consent in a way that is comprehensive.

However, discussing consent with children in a way that acknowledges its various facets is hugely important because as children go through adolescence and then adulthood, the way that they have learned about consent as a child will inform how they interact with other adults and children in their own interpersonal relationships.

How to Teach Consent

Teaching consent to children can be done in a variety of ways, and teaching consent doesn’t always have to be in the form of a long sit-down discussion about consent (although those discussions are important, too).

In fact, teaching consent is an ongoing process in which different scenarios come up as children grown and learn, and each scenario presents its own questions about the rules of consent.

In general, there are a few rules that you can discuss with kids that can help them understand the basics of consent and help them react appropriately when faced with new situations.

Here are five simple steps to follow when teaching kids about consent:

1. Teach Them How to Ask for Consent

For the most part, kids aren’t in the business of purposely hurting others.

If a child physically interacts with another child without asking (whether that is taking another child’s toy, hugging them, pushing them out of the way, and so forth), it’s usually because they haven’t been taught yet that they are supposed to ask for consent.

It’s easy to respond retroactively to a child who has already physically interacted with another child and gotten a bad response. For example, if a child hugs another child and that child begins to cry, we might be more inclined to respond than if they hug and nothing happens.

That is to say, we don’t usually view something as a “problem” until it is a serious problem. Kids act on impulse, and sometimes they do things that aren’t appropriate without realizing that their actions are inappropriate. This is where teaching kids to ask for consent first is important.

Teaching kids to ask “Is it okay if I…?” before touching another person is essential when we are attempting to help them understand consent.

Kids should be taught to ask this question anytime they are going to physically interact with another child.

Not only does this help them understand that it’s important to ask for permission before touching someone, but it helps with impulse control.

When a child knows that no matter what, they must ask for permission before touching someone else, it creates an extra step in their thought process: Instead of going from wanting to grab someone’s arm to immediately doing it, they are forced to take a moment to think in between those two actions.

2. Let Them Know That Consent Can Be Given or Taken Away Anytime

One aspect of consent that is often met with confusion by children and adults alike is whether or not consent can be taken away once it is given the first time.

In short, yes. It can.

Just because someone gives you consent to touch them once doesn’t mean that their consent is indefinite. Consent can be removed at any point during any interaction.

This is frequently skipped over when we talk about consent to kids because it is something that we, ourselves (both individually and as a society), still present as something ambiguous.

One fear that many survivors of sexual violence have when considering whether or not to report their assault is that they worry that if they have previously consented to physical contact with their assailant, then any subsequent physical contact with that person is lawfully allowed, whether they consented in the moment or not.

We see this a lot when we look at partner sexual assault and date rape. Because the victim has a familiarity with their rapist, they believe that person has a right to physical contact due to the nature of the relationship.

It’s important to explain to children that even in the middle of a physical encounter, consent can be removed, and consenting to one form of physical contact does not automatically mean that you have consented to every physical action.

Consenting to a hug does not mean that a person has also consented to a kiss or any other form of physical contact, and familiarity with a person does not equal consent either.

When we discuss this with children, it is crucial to explain the importance of checking in — frequently — with whomever they are interacting with to make sure that what they are doing is okay.

3. Discuss the Importance of ‘No’

Giving and removing consent should be the same between children, as well as between children and adults.

A child should never be forced to interact physically with an adult. Ever. Yes, even in cases where the adult is a relative, family friend, teacher, coach, and so on.

When discussing consent with kids, you should let them know that they are under no obligation to be hugged, kissed, touched, or otherwise physically interacted with by another person, no matter the relationship.

Often, we force kids to give hugs to relatives, receive a pat on the back from a coach, or give a kiss on the cheek to a family friend because it seems harmless. In the event that a kid says, “I don’t want to,” they are often met with disapproval — and then are forced to do it anyway.

Not only does forcing a child to do these things tell the child that “no” is not an acceptable answer, but the implication is that their refusal is not respected or validated. What this can do is create a situation where a child believes this not only in regard to people that they know, but also in regard to interacting with people that they don’t know.

In some cases, a child’s aversion to being touched by a particular person might even be cause for alarm.

If a child expresses that they do not feel comfortable being touched by someone, their feelings should be validated, and then you can have a discussion about the reasons why the child does not feel comfortable around that person.

The conversation about the importance of “no” should not be one where kids are told, “Don’t ever let a stranger touch you if you don’t want them to.” It should be one where kids are told, “You don’t have to let anyone touch you if you don’t want them to.”

4. Help Them Understand the Difference Between a Non-Response and Enthusiastic Consent

The definition of enthusiastic consent is this: an active, visible, undeniable “yes.”

Usually the idea of enthusiastic consent falls under discussions of sexual interactions. However, introducing the idea of enthusiastic consent when discussing consent with children can combat much of the ambiguity that they might face down the line.

Discussing enthusiastic consent doesn’t necessarily have to be discussed in regard to sexual acts. Rather, the discussion with kids can be about the fact that a non-response is not the same thing as someone saying “yes.”

An inability to vocalize a “no” can happen for a variety of reasons: fear of repercussions, feelings of discomfort, a disability, and so on. So it’s important to explain to kids that just because someone didn’t say “no” does not mean that they are definitely saying “yes.”

This goes to the previous point about always asking for permission to touch someone else. If one kid asks another kid for permission to hug them, if the second kid doesn’t say “no,” that doesn’t mean that hugging them is okay.

What needs to happen before physical contact is made is for the kid to say, “Yes, it is okay for you to hug me.” If the “yes” doesn’t happen, then they shouldn’t be touched.

This is how you teach enthusiastic consent. It doesn’t matter the circumstance. If someone does not respond with a “yes,” then you do not touch them.

5. Follow Your Own Rules for Consent

Children are impressionable. Therefore, as an adult, you have to follow your own rules for consent.

Kids watch adults to learn the appropriate ways to interact in their own interpersonal relationships.

If you don’t ask for consent, if you ignore the word “no,” or if you force consent upon another person, it won’t matter what you tell a child because the rules will become invalidated by your own actions.

You should never force a child to physically interact with you without first asking for their consent. If they say “no,” you shouldn’t tell them that they’re wrong or force them to interact with you anyway.

In addition, the rules for consent that you discuss with a child should be enforced in all situations. Kids should understand that it doesn’t matter if they are at home, at a friend’s house, at school, or on the playground — the rules about consent still apply.

Permission Rather Than Forgiveness

Conversations about consent – especially if those conversations are with children – are not always easy to have.

They are, however, necessary if we’re trying to create a society in which consent is understood and respected by adults and children alike.

It is important to begin talking having these discussions with kids when they’re young so that the decisions that they make as they proceed through adolescence and adulthood are informed by their understanding of what it means to give and receive consent.


Thuh NekST KonsepTs Ahr Fruhm:

Did we ask our friend or relative, if we may touch or play with their things?

To ask to use or touch something, or even enter a room is called Asking for Permission. Sometimes people don’t like it and may even get upset, if you touch their things. Your friend may even fight with you and not speak to you. Because they may feel they are being taken for granted

Asking for permission is social etiquette

Do you remember, we learned about social etiquette and that we must say please and thank you? Well, asking for permission, before we touch or use something that doesn’t belong to us, is also social etiquette.

So, remember to ask for permission the next time!


Thuh NekST KonsepTs Ahr Fruhm:

Thank You Etiquette: Do you say "thank you" the right way?

Thank you. It sounds pretty simple, and you might think you're using it correctly. But are you sure you’re saying thank you every time you should be? And are you saying thank you even when you shouldn’t be?

When to Say Thank You

Thank others for everything from opening a door for you to cleaning up after you. Neglecting to do so only highlights your selfishness.

Another reason to say thank you is for an act of kindness. If your kid's soccer coach invests his or her time and energy in your little tyke, a thank you is in order. You should certainly thank someone who takes a little work off your plate. Even if your coworker is actually expected to do that job for you, saying thank you shows you respect the working relationship and builds trust between you.

Thank others for everything from opening a door for you to cleaning up after you or buying you a meal. Neglecting to do so shines a spotlight on your selfishness and tells others that you think the rest of the world should be doing those things for you. I assure you they should not be…

Say Thank You for Constructive Criticism

When you receive constructive criticism, say thank you. Not everyone is out to get you, so remember to keep yourself in check as you are getting criticism. Always be willing to accept advice from those who you know are interested in your improvement. Then humbly thank them for the things that help you become a better person…

Even if someone criticizes you out of ill will, they still might have a valid point. When you get over your initial reaction to shove them down and take their shoes, examine the critique for its worth and thank them for any valuable advice that may have slipped through their snide comment. Saying thank you in this situation does something very interesting to people. When they see that you are becoming a better person by taking their vicious advice, it confuses them. They might start to see that you aren't the threat they imagined and may begin to treat you differently…

When Should You Send Thank You Notes?

There are many standard reasons to say thank you, including after you receive a gift—whether it’s for your graduation, birthday, baby shower, wedding, etc. It really should go without saying that thanking people for gifts requires sending a handwritten note. And you should get that thank you note out post-haste. Waiting weeks or months is not really appropriate. Holding out for a year, no matter the circumstances, is rude. Of course, the note should be sent even if it's late. Starting thank you notes is usually the hardest part, so just make yourself sit down and write one note. Then write another. If you keep that up, you'll soon find that you're done and your manners will still be in tact.

If you are really delinquent in sending out a thank you note, apologize briefly and humbly. Don't belabor the point, though, as that will cause the recipient to feel like they were a burden to you— and you do not want that…

When Shouldn’t You Say Thank You?

Do not thank someone sarcastically out of frustration. When a cashier who has been working all day accidentally drops your eggs on the ground, saying a condescending, "thanks a lot," is not appropriate—absolutely not appropriate. When your spouse locks the keys in the car on your way to the airport, a sarcastic "thanks" is only going to make that person feel worse. Something I've learned from almost fourteen years of marriage is that sarcasm is not going to make your spouse love you any more. Firing off a sarcastic "thank you" out of frustration is only meant to make yourself feel important. Manners are about making others feel important! Have patience in that situation.

Thank you is a special phrase that should be kept for building someone up. Make it a habit to spend a little time remembering all the things your spouse or significant other does for you— that can be for parents and friends as well. Then, even if it's just a few words, say thank you often.

That goes for your kids too— or those who work for you. Teach appreciation by example. Thank them for jobs well done. Thank them for working hard. Then help them know when it's their turn to thank someone else.

Bottom Line

Thank others for their generosity. Thank others for the little things and not just the big things. Thank others out of humility and not sarcasm. You don't always have to thank with a note or a gift, but try to thank others often.

I sincerely thank you for joining me for this installment of The Modern Manners Guy's Quick and Dirty Tips for a More Polite Life.


Thuh NekST KonsepTs Ahr Fruhm:

Healthy Relationships

What Does Consent Mean?

As important as consent is, we don’t talk about it enough. So it’s understandable if you’re a little unsure about what it is – and what it isn’t.

People typically talk about consent in the context of some kind of sexual or physical activity with a partner. In a healthy relationship, both (or all) partners are able to openly talk about and agree on what kind of activity they want to engage in. Whether it’s holding hands, kissing, touching, intercourse, or anything else, it’s really important for everyone in the relationship to feel comfortable with what’s happening.

You may have heard the phrase “no means no.” That’s totally true, but it doesn’t really provide a complete picture of consent because it puts the responsibility on one person to resist or accept an activity. It also makes consent about what someone doesn’t want to do, instead of being about openly expressing what they do want to do.

Well, How Does It Work?

Some people are worried that talking about or getting consent will be awkward or that it will “ruin the mood,” which is far from true. If anything, the mood is much more positive when both partners feel safe and can freely communicate about what they want. First off, talk about what terms like “hooking up” or “going all the way” mean to each partner. Consider having these conversations during a time when you’re not being physically intimate.

If you are in the heat if the moment, here are some suggestions of things to say:

Are you comfortable?
Is this okay?
Do you want to slow down?
Do you want to go any further?

What consent looks like:

Communicating every step of the way. For example, during a hookup, ask if it’s okay to take your partner’s shirt off. Don’t just assume that they are comfortable with it.

Respecting that when they don’t say “no,” it doesn’t mean “yes.” Consent is a clear and enthusiastic yes! If someone seems unsure, stays silent, doesn’t respond, or says “Maybe…” then they aren’t saying “yes.”

Breaking away from gender “rules.” Girls are not the only ones who might want to take it slow. Also, it’s not a guy’s job to initiate the action (or anything else, really).

What consent does NOT look like:

Assuming that dressing sexy, flirting, accepting a ride, accepting a drink etc. is in any way consenting to anything more.

Saying yes (or saying nothing) while under the influence of drugs or alcohol.

Saying yes or giving in to something because you feel too pressured or too afraid to say no.

Here are some red flags that indicate your partner doesn’t respect consent:

They pressure or guilt you into doing things you may not want to do.

They make you feel like you “owe” them — because you’re dating, or they gave you a gift, etc.

They react negatively (with sadness, anger or resentment) if you say “no” to something, or don’t immediately consent.

They ignore your wishes and don’t pay attention to nonverbal cues that could show you’re not consenting (ex: pulling/pushing away).

Get Consent Every Time

In a healthy relationship, it’s important to discuss and respect each other’s boundaries on the regular. It’s not okay to assume that once someone consents to an activity, it means they are consenting to it anytime in the future as well. Whether it’s the first time or the hundredth time, a hookup, a committed relationship or even marriage, nobody is ever obligated to consent to something, even if they’ve done it in the past. A person can decide to stop an activity at any time, even if they agreed to it earlier. Above all, everyone has a right to their own body and to feel comfortable with how they use it.


CourTesy Tends Tu ReezuLT In (Pure+Good = Non-bad)…

( VolunTay ConsenT Izm ) Iz ( Free Will Tu Kom Yes If U Djeneewin Li Uhgree)

( VoLunTary Non-ConsenT Izm ) Iz ( Free Will Tu Kom No ), espehshaLLee Tu (musT-yes =anTi-no izm).

Every Mynd Should AkT Az A Non-ConsenT IsT Ohr MuTual+ConsenT IsT (OpT Tu Kom Noh Ohr Yes),

*and ( az less az possible or nevr ) az a mandaTory-consenT isT.

OpTional ConsenT Izm Iz Oft Mohr ConsideraTe And Wyz

Than:

  • mandiTory consenT (musT yes and anTi-no) izm
  • and anTi consenT (wohn'T yes) izm.

Must-yess ists aka anTi-No IsTs ShouLd GeT Told "NO, I Won'T LeT U In!!!"

Last Lyn Uhv Tekst In Paeej Naeemd " Kuhnsent Ehtikkeht ".


Kuhnsent Ehtikkeht Iz Thuh Betr Opshuhn Wen Rehkuhmended With Proh Non-Raeep.


Proh Non raeep

( Raeep = Rape ) iz The naym of Sex rong.

Raeep iz The naeem Uv vyolayshuhn fuk ThaT duz koz

  • ( Min DisComforTIng Tu Varying UhmownTs Uv SensT Eemohshun Uhv FeeLeeng { TresspasT UhgensT } ),
    • Tu ( Less Ohr Mohr ) { sehveerLee } ViolaTed Rongd,
  • Tu FuLLee InTenss TrahmahTyzd ReepeeTedLy SehveerLee VyohLaeeTed FeeLingz )
  • Uhv sex tresspass violayTed rongd.

Thuss raeep iz nevr okay.

Uh Non-Raeep Ist Attittuud Theenks That Raeep Iz:

1: uh rong attittuud in an akt,
2: uh rong attittuud in a reelaeeshuhnship,
3: uh rong attittuud in a room,
4: uh rong attittuud in a home,
5: and shuurlee uh rong theem in uh sohsyehtee.

Proh Non-raeep!!!


Rape is vioLaishuhn rong and eiTher:

  • corrupT (a mix uhv uhnHeLThee uhnkuhnsidraT fahr Too selfish undeezrvd breef plezhr wyl kozeeng:
  • Fruhm LeSS bad violaTed Trez Rongd=suhfreeng vicTim) ohr
  • 100% bad (non-plezhrd and non-neuTral) skin ThaT felT uhsulT Trezd Thuhs kozzeeng a wound Ohr mulTiple woundz ThaT duhz koz sufr feelz.

Thuh NexT TexT Duhz Teech:

Pro Thuh LeesT Uhmownt Uhv Rape Az PossibL…

Pro Az Much Non Rape Az Can Bee…

IT Iz Civvilyzd KrTesee Mannrz Tu:

* Ask Sum Ask Suhm SkripT Lyk "May I…"

  • Pree Self Bod Tryz InTimmuhsee AkT Twohrdz An UhThr

* Then Honr And ReespekT Thuh Prsuhn'z RyT Tu SeT Ohr Looss Bowndz

* By Non VyohleyTeeng WuhT A Prsuhn Komd NO Tu)

  • Iz AhLWayz Peewr Good Non (Trez=violaTion), Thus BeTr Than Rape.

Rape Iz UnCivviLyzd Rude (dev ill)=(Devvelluhp dis eez)=(Koz Tu Suhfr and Thus FeeL unhappy) sex (Trez=vyohleyshuhn) rong ThaT norm duhz koz aT leesT suhm suhfr feelz

A mohr violaTed vicTim Duhz Senss mohr bad rongd sufr feelz.


Thuh NeksT TekST Wuhz Fruhm:

UN Makes History on Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity

Human Rights Body Establishes an Independent Expert

(Geneva) – The United Nations Human Rights Council, in a defining vote, adopted a resolution on June 30, 2016, on “Protection against violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation, and gender identity,” to mandate the appointment of an independent expert on the subject. It is a historic victory for the human rights of anyone at risk of discrimination and violence because of their sexual orientation or gender identity, a coalition of human rights groups said today. This resolution builds upon two previous resolutions, adopted by the Council in 2011 and 2014.
United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon addresses the 25th session of the Human Rights Council at the United Nations in Geneva March 3, 2014
Expand

United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon addresses the 25th session of the Human Rights Council at the United Nations in Geneva, March 3, 2014. © 2014 Reuters/Denis Balibouse

The Core Group of seven Latin American countries – Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Mexico, Uruguay – and 41 additional countries jointly presented the text.

The resolution was adopted by a vote of 23 in favor, 18 against and six abstentions.

“This is truly momentous,” said Micah Grzywnowicz, of the Swedish Federation for LGBTQ Rights (RFSL). “This is our opportunity to bring international attention to specific violations and challenges faced by transgender and gender non-conforming persons in all regions. It’s time for the international community to take responsibility to ensure that persons at risk of violence and discrimination because of gender identity are not left behind.”

“It’s a historic resolution,” said Josefina Valencia, of the International LGBTI Association for Latin America and the Caribbean, ILGA LAC. “Latin America has played a very important role to build a common course for the advancement of our human rights. We are proud of the international solidarity and the commitment shown by States for equality.”

The positive vote responds to a joint campaign of a record 628 nongovernmental organizations from 151 countries calling on the Human Rights Council to adopt the resolution and create the independent expert.

“It is important to note that around 70 percent of the organizations are from the global south,” said Yahia Zaidi of MantiQitna Network. “This is a powerful cross-regional message of strength to the UN to protect the rights of LGBTI persons. The independent expert will be a focal point for all violations based on SOGI and hence help grassroots organizations to better utilize the otherwise complex labyrinth of the UN system.”

The expert will be tasked with assessing implementation of existing international human rights law, identifying best practices and gaps, raising awareness of violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, engaging in dialogue and consultation with states and other stakeholders, and facilitating provision of advisory services, technical assistance, capacity-building, and cooperation to help address violence and discrimination on these grounds.

“To have an independent expert can be a ‘game-changer’ in counteracting violence which fuels the HIV epidemic in key populations and more specifically in LGBT communities,” said Alain Kra of Espace Confiance.

“It will ease the work of all human rights defenders and it is essential for our governments and people to have the knowledge on how to protect LGBT communities from any violence and discrimination they face,” added Joleen Mataele of the Tonga Leiti’s Association.

Although a number of hostile amendments seeking to introduce notions of cultural relativism were adopted into the text by vote, the core of the resolution affirming the universal nature of international human rights law stood firm.

“Today, the UN took a historic step forward,” said John Fisher, Geneva director at Human Rights Watch. “By creating a UN expert, the Human Rights Council has given official voice to those facing violations because of their sexual orientation or gender identity the world over. There can be no turning back, and we look forward to working with civil society colleagues and the new UN expert toward a world free from violence and discrimination for all people regardless of sexual orientation and gender identity.”

Results of the vote

Voting in favor of the resolution
Albania, Belgium, Bolivia, Cuba, Ecuador, El Salvador, France, Georgia, Germany, Latvia, Macedonia, Mexico, Mongolia, Netherlands, Panama, Paraguay, Portugal, Republic of Korea, Slovenia, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Venezuela, Vietnam

Voting against the resolution
Algeria, Bangladesh, Burundi, China, Congo, Cote d’Ivoire, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Maldives, Morocco, Nigeria, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Togo, United Arab Emirates

Abstaining on the resolution
Botswana, Ghana, India, Namibia, Philippines, South Africa

Supporting organizations

Access Chapter
AIDES France
Amnesty International
ARC International
Clóset de Sor Juana AC
Egale Canada Human Rights Trust
Espacio de Mujeres Lesbianas Salvadoreñas por la Diversidad (ESMULES)
Federatie van Nederlandse Verenigingen tot Integratie van Homoseksualiteit - COC Nederland
Foundation for SOGI Rights and Justice (FORSOGI)
FRI, the Norwegian Organisation for Sexual and Gender Diversity
GALANG Philippines
Human Rights Law Centre
Human Rights Watch
Iranti-org
International Commission of Jurists
ILGA LAC, Asociación Internacional de Lesbianas, Gays, Bisexuales, Trans e Intersexuales para América Latina y el Caribe
International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association (ILGA)
Lesbians, Gays and Bisexuals of Botswana (LEGABIBO)
LGBT Denmark - the National Organization for Gay Men, Lesbians, Bisexuals and Transgendered People
MantiQitna Network
OutRight Action International
Pacific Sexual Diversity Network
Pan Africa ILGA
Proyecto Arcoiris, colectivo anticapitalista e independiente
Samoa Faafafine Association
Swedish Federation for LGBTQ Rights (RFSL)
TLF Share Collective – Philippines
Tonga Leitis Association


Thuh Followeeng Konsepts Ahr In Thiss Paeej AT

" Pohliggamee Shood Bee Leegul "


Thuh NeksT TekST Wuhz Fruhm:

What's Polygamy?

This is where an individual has more than one spouse and everyone is in agreement. This is not cheating and certainly is not bigamy. Polygamy is a choice and a way of life for thousands of people worldwide.

What's a polygamist?

A polygamist is someone who practises Polygamy. Most commonly this will be one man with multiple wives and this is becomes family unit.

All the [ spouses ] are friends and are to be treated as equals.


Thuh NeksT TekST Wuhz Fruhm:

Polygamy Is Legal In Utah, For Now

A federal judge issued a final ruling Wednesday in the so-called Sister Wives case, handing the stars of the TLC show a resounding victory.

[ By ] Jim Dalrymple II BuzzFeed News Reporter

Posted on August 27, 2014, at 9:28 p.m. ET

A judge ruled Wednesday that the law making Polygamy illegal in Utah is unconstitutional.

Here's what you need to know: What just happened?

A federal judge in Salt Lake City — Clark Waddoups — issued a final ruling in the so-called Sister Wives case, which is known for the TLC show that prompted it. Sister Wives stars the polygamous Brown family, who sued in 2011 because officials where they lived threatened to come after them.

The Brown family won their biggest victory in December, when the judge said the Utah law that made Polygamy illegal — and which would have been used against them — was unconstitutional. The case was left hanging, however, while both sides argued over whether or not the family's rights were violated by years of criminal investigations.

Wednesday's ruling resolves all the pending issues and hands a resounding victory to the Browns. Not only did the judge decide that the law against Polygamy was unconstitutional, he also agreed that the family's rights had been violated and said they "are entitled to an award of attorney's fees, costs, and expenses incurred in this action."

This all effectively means that for the time being Polygamy in Utah is no longer illegal.

Wasn't Polygamy already legal in Utah?

That's, like, one of the main things the state is famous for, right?

Utah is indeed known for Polygamy — there's even a local beer cheekily called "Polygamy Porter" — but also has a surprisingly contentious past when it comes to non-monogamous marriages. The state's reputation dates back to its founders, Mormon pioneers, whose faith included "plural marriage." The mainstream Mormon Church banned Polygamy in the late 1800s, but some members of the church refused to accept the policy change and gradually broke away to form their own groups.

Today, there are many different groups in Utah that practice polygamy, but they're mostly small and often live either in relatively rural communities or on the peripheries of urban areas. (There are some notable exceptions, such as the very open Darger family, or the more secretive Kingston group.) The average Utahn is not a polygamist.

In any case, the lifestyle of Utah's polygamous groups was illegal because the state had a law against cohabitation.

Wait, cohabitation?

Technically, yes.

In practice, however, the law was not enforced against monogamous couples. Instead, it was seen as a way for officials to go after polygamous families. Even that was pretty rare, but the potential threat remained, as the Brown family learned when prosecutors starting hinting about going after them.

With this case wrapping up, however, it's no longer illegal to cohabitant with someone in the state of Utah.

So Polygamy is legalized in Utah. Can anyone go down to the courthouse and get married to multiple people?

No. The best way to describe the effect of this case is to say that Polygamy, as practiced in Utah, is not illegal. It's still against the law in Utah to get legally married to multiple people, which is bigamy.

But that's kind of a mouthful, so the simplified version is that anyone can live with anyone else — polygamists and monogamists included — without breaking the law.

The reason this case legalized Polygamy is because most polygamists in Utah aren't actually trying to get legally married to each other; after their first marriage, they merely have a "spiritual" or religious ceremony. That used to be illegal because it was cohabitation, but now it is not.

enhanced-buzz-9800-1409187454-18.jpg?downsize=800:*&output-format=auto&output-quality=auto
The polygamous Williams family — including five wives, from left to right, Robyn, Paulie, Rhonda, Nonie and Rosemary — live near Salt Lake City.

So what happens next?

Utah in December vowed to appeal the ruling. In response to Wednesday's decision, Utah Attorney General spokeswoman said Wednesday that the state was still deciding what to do next:

The Attorney General's Office is currently reviewing Judge Waddoups's ruling of Brown v Herbert and will make final determination of whether or not to appeal one or more of the issues in the decision within the coming weeks. It is important to legally assess the ruling's scope and how it will impact future litigation.

The Browns' attorney, however, pointed out Wednesday on his blog that the state is under no obligation to appeal and could instead just let it go. The state certainly has bigger battles it's trying to fight — notably, a same-sex marriage case that it has been losing — but Utah's attorney general has made Polygamy a major issue since taking office late last year.

Life for most polygamists also will likely go on relatively unchanged; after the ruling in December, members of Utah's largest concentrated polygamous community said they doubted it would have much of an impact. That's in part because they aren't seeking legal polygamous marriages, as well as because years of living under intense scrutiny has prompted some groups to adopt relatively isolationist cultures.

Picture of Jim Dalrymple II

jimdalrympleii-v2-3655-1538362437-0_large.jpg

Jim Dalrymple is a reporter for BuzzFeed News and is based in Los Angeles.

Contact Jim Dalrymple II at moc.deefzzub|elpmyrlad.mij#moc.deefzzub|elpmyrlad.mij.


Thuh NeksT TekST Wuhz Fruhm:

Polygamy In United States Of America

By [ Admin Uhv https://www.polygamy.com/ ] September, 30th 2015


Thuh NeksT TekST Wuhz Fruhm:

So why Polygamy.com?

We are the first and leading polygamy matchmaking service.
We set up this service as we believe polygamy is a lifestyle choice that people make and those people deserve to be represented

What's polygamy?


Thuh NeksT TekST Wuhz Fruhm:

Polygamy In United States Of America

By [ Admin Uhv https://www.polygamy.com/ ] September, 30th 2015


Thuh NeksT TekST Wuhz Fruhm:

So why Polygamy.com?

We are the first and leading polygamy matchmaking service.
We set up this service as we believe polygamy is a lifestyle choice that people make and those people deserve to be represented.


Thuh NeksT TekST Wuhz Fruhm:

Before you start

You must understand the legality regarding matrimonial polygamy. We do not condone any activity which is regarded illegal.

[ The ] site [ https://www.polygamy.com ] is targeting individuals who are seeking a polygamous marriage. In some countries polygamy is accepted, but not all. It is your responsibility to check local law where you reside. In countries where polygamy is illegal, those who wish to practice it must accept that there is to be no legal signing of a marriage certificate; especially if you are entering into a second, third, or fourth marriage. Legally this would then be seen as no different to one man having multiple female companions. Please research and understand your legal rights which can [ tho shouldn't ] differ greatly from monogamous marriages.

We advise you still have a ceremony in which your families and the religious community recognise the marriage, even though it may not be legally recognised.

This site is not for everyone. We strongly advise you seek as much knowledge and advice as you can before entering into a polygamous arrangement.

Why choose us?

We aim to help out those who wish to practice polygamy in the most decent and respectful manner. We care.

Muslim Specific Polygamy

In Islam polygamy is widely accepted as the prophets themselves practiced it. As Muslims tend to seek Muslim partners we have a dedicated Muslim Polygamy Service. We suggest you use https://www.SecondWife.com - Muslim Polygamy. They offer a great service and adhere to the Islamic principles and teachings regarding marriage.

[ https://www.polygamy.com is not a ] Dating Monogamous Marriage Service

If polygamy is not for you but you are still seeking marriage. We suggest you use https://www.GoMarry.com. There you will get to meet similar minded people who don't want to waste their time on short term relationships and are seeking to start a family the right way, through marriage.


Thiss Iz Thuh Last Lyn Uhv Tekst In Thuh Paeej Naeemd " Pohligamee Shood Bee Leegal

Thiss Iz Thuh Last Lyn Uhv Tekst In Thuh Paeej Naeemd " Intimmuhsee Prefss "


Hows HohLd Syzohmz


ReeL EsTaeeT Syz Ohmz
ReaL EsTaTe Sizomes & ReeL EsTaiT Syz Ohmz


Town Syz Ohms


STaeeT Syzohmz


Kuntree Syzohmz


Continental Governments


AnTy Croosiffikshuhn Izm

AnTicrucifixionism Ohr AnTicrucifixion izm Ohr AnTi crucifixionism Ohr AnTi crucifixion ism


Anti- = UhgehnsT


Included page "penalty" does not exist (create it now)


Thuh NeksT TekST Wuhz Fruhm:

As a method of execution, in which the condemned prisoner is tied or nailed to a large tree or wooden cross and left to hang there until dead, crucifixion is perhaps the death penalty at its worst…


Thuh NeksT TekST Wuhz Fruhm:

Crucifixion…Definition

Crucifixion (صلبه salb) typically refers to the painful method of execution and/or torture by tying and/or nailing someone to a cross, stake or tree. It can also refer to the method of public display of a body after execution.


wrd kruusiffikshuhn Deskrybd next az:

  • ( t->oh->r->ch->r spohk fohrm hv wrd torchure ) victim
    • with ( k->r->r->ū->s->ĭ->f->ĭ->k->s -> kruusiffikss nohrm soeld az "crusifix" )
      • ( "tohrchr wehpuhn" nohrm speld az "torchure weapon" )
    • with prpuss tu mrdr victim with kruusiffix ( mrdr wehpuhn nohrm speld az "mrdr wehpuhn

Included page "penalty" does not exist (create it now)


Thuh NeksT KohrekTed TekST Wuhz Fruhm:

__**the [ nevr deezrvd unFair unJusT pseudoh- ] penalty of crucifixion

  • [ Shood Fruhm Now And ( Fohr Evr Feewchr ) GeT ToT uhv az ehneetheeng EksepT
    • ( Nevr Uhgehn ahthryzd By Mee ) kuz: ]**__

Cause of Death by Crucifixion

Anatomy of Nails in Crucifixion
Anatomy-of-Nails-in-Crucifixion-150x150.jpg

Death could come in hours or days, depending on the methods used, the health of those crucified and environmental circumstances.

One theory holds that death was caused by asphyxiation. With the whole body weight borne by the stretched arms, the victim’s ability to exhale was severely compromised. In order to breathe the victim would have to draw himself up by his arms, or have his feet supported by tying or by a wood block.

Roman executioners would break a victim’s legs in order to hasten death. The two thieves on either side of Christ had their legs broken. With broken legs a man could not support himself for breath and died within a few minutes.

It was typical to prepare a condemned for crucifixion by inflicting other wounds. Each wound was intended to produce intense agony. This is consistent with accounts of Christ’s scourging.[4]

While asphyxiation has been proposed as the principal cause of death from crucifixion, the fact remains that sometimes individuals survived on a cross for days. Modern science has proposed that death resulted from a number of other causes, including physical shock, dehydration, and exhaustion. Historical records indicate that besides the breaking of legs, death could be hastened by building a fire below the cross with the smoke choking the victim, or inflicting additional wounds.[5]

A 2006 study published in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine looked at medical theories on the cause of death in crucifixion. The conclusion of the study, given that the researchers could not humanely reenact an actual crucifixion was that “there is insufficient evidence to safely state exactly how people did die from crucifixion in Roman times”.

From the Persians to the Romans

Crucifixions are recorded among ancient civilizations, originating with the Persians. The original crucifixions were not on a cross traditionally associated with ( Iesous -> Jesus ). The victim was tied or impaled upon a single upright stake. The victim’s hands and feet were bound and nailed to the stake using just one nail through both wrists and one nail through both ankles, with a wooden plank fastened to the stake as a footrest.

From the Persians, crucifixions spread to the Assyrians, Scythians, Carthaginians, Germans, Celts and Britons. Execution by crucifixion became common under the rule of Greek King Alexander the Great (356-323 B.C.). Eventually, crucifixion became the principal Roman form of capital punishment. During the Roman Empire, violent offenders, those guilty of high treason, despised enemies, deserters, slaves and foreigners were crucified.



UhgensT sacrifyss mrdr uhv InnuhsenT BeesTs

Sum AnnihmuLz Deezynd Az InnussenT Non-vyohLent VejjeTTerreeun BeesTs WiTH Braeenz Thoh Noh Handz.

IT Iz rong tu sacrifyss mrdr InnussenT BeesTs.

Eech AnnimmuL ThaT Growz a Braeen Iz A BeesT ThaT Kan Maybee Lrn Tu Bee A Prsun


Yahweh UhgehnsT sacriffyseeng BeesTs Uv YaHWeH

NesT Vrss Groop Fruhm https://biblehub.com/web/isaiah/1.htm

10 Hear the word of Yahweh, you rulers of Sodom! Listen to the law of our God, you people of Gomorrah!

11 "What are the multitude of your sacrifices to me?," says Yahweh. "I have had enough of the burnt offerings of rams, and the fat of fed animals. I don't delight in the blood of bulls, or of lambs, or of male goats.

12 When you come to appear before me, who has required this at your hand, to trample my courts?

13 Bring no more vain offerings. Incense is an abomination to me; new moons, Sabbaths, and convocations: I can't bear with evil assemblies.

14 My soul hates your New Moons and your appointed feasts. They are a burden to me. I am weary of bearing them.

15 When you spread forth your hands, I will hide my eyes from you. Yes, when you make many prayers, I will not hear. Your hands are full of blood.


16 Wash yourselves, make yourself clean. Put away the evil of your doings from before my eyes. Cease to do evil.

17 Learn to do well. Seek JusTice. Relieve the oppressed. Judge the FaTherless //and MuhThrless. Plead for the widow."

18 "Come now, and LeT us reason TogeTher," says Yahweh: "Though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as WhiTe as snow. Though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.

19 If you are willing and ObedienT, you shall eat the good of the land;

20 but if you refuse and rebel, you shall be [destroy'd]; for the mouth of Yahweh has spoken it."


Iesous Came Tu UhboLLish Sakrihfysez

Thuh NexT TekST Wuhz Fruhm:

Sixth Fragment
[Jesus said] "I am come to abolish the sacrifices: if ye cease not from sacrificing, the wrath (of God) will not cease from weighing upon you."


InnuhsenT Iesous Non-deezrvd deth

InnuhsenT Iesous Non-deezrvd deth by killeeng, espeshuLLee Non veeuh kruusihfikshuhn that iz torchr vyohLaeeshuhn eewwzeeng a kruusiffix-torchr-wehpuhn with gohl tu uhkomplish mrdr Krym.

Iesous Wuz ToT Tu Bee Uh HeeLr Huu DyrekTLee Kozd ReeLeef Frŭm sufreeng ŭv lots ŭv kyndz And Huu Nevr Torchrd EHnee Heewman Nor Ennee AnnimmuL, EksepT Wuhn Day maybe Tu A Donkey BeesT WyL Rydeeng ITs Bak Thoh Thuh Donkey Non-dyd, Thus Iesous Nevr Deezrvd SpessiffikuLLee tohrchr till mrdrd.

InnuhsenT Iesous Wuhz Jujd By Thuh Guhvrnur PiLaTe And Non-SuspecTed Uhv Az Mehnee Az Wuhn Krym.

Iesous Wuhz SpessiffikLee non-pruuvd giltee uhv mrdr, Thus Non-Deesrvd Tu get kild.

Thus Iesous' deth shood ohnLee GeT ThoT Uhv ohnLee az An Unjust mrdr.

Truu Justiss Wood Bee If I Kood Go Bak In Tym Tu Beefohr Thuh Kruusiffikshuhn Uhv Iesous And Gahrd Iesous Fruhm Getteeng Kruusiffyd.

Then, Zeeroh Peepul Wood Theenk

  • ThaT " It wuhz reekwyrd for Iesous Tu hav been Kruusiffyd ".

Pleez Heer YouTube Vid Naeemd " Crucifixion Is Unjust "

  • In Wich It Iz Said, "Thuh gravest unjustice is to punish Thuh 1 Huu Did NoT Commit Thuh Sin."


kruusifikshuhn Nevr Deezrvd

Az Uh PrinsippuL, a kursifix kross iz nevr needed.

IT Iz Nevr Nessesserree tu tohrchr suhmwuhn with ĕnee kruusiffix till they dy.

Thus, kruusifikshuhn torchr vyŏlayt till mrdrd iz

  • ( Nevr Fair ) Thus ( Nevr JusT )
  • Thus ( Evr too sehveer Fohr Ehnee 1 WiTh Kuhmpashuhn )
  • tu get kŏld ehneetheeng except non- ] penalty of crucifixion
  • [ Shood Fruhm Now And ( Fohr Evr Feewchr ) GeT ToT uhv az ehneetheeng EksepT
    • ( Nevr Uhgehn ahthryzd By Mee ) kuz: ]**__

Thuh NeksT TekST Wuhz Fruhm:

Crucifixion in the Modern World

Though of ancient origin and brutal in its application, crucifixion has survived to modern times in parts of the world. German soldiers are said to have crucified a Canadian during World War I. In Japan it was used for prisoners[6] during World War II. Crucifixion as a criminal punishment remains as part of Iran’s Islamic Criminal Law. Crucifixion survives as part of the penal code in Sudan. In March, 2013, a man convicted of armed robbery in Saudi Arabia was sentenced to be crucified for three days.

The Easter season involves remembrances [ uhv InnuhsenT Iesous'z

  • ( nevr Fair nohr JusT ) torchr and ( nevr Fair nohr JusT ) mrdr] suffering and death. For Christians it [ shood hav noh ] meaning [ uhv Luhv Nohr ] sacrifice. Attention to the nature of ChrisT’s death and its use through history should remind all of us of the need to battle the darkest sides of humanity.

Thuh Troo bad rong repreezenTed by ( wrd Croosiffikshuhn wich iz norm miss-speld az crucifixion )

FacT: croosiffikshun ReeL rong kuz reel bad torchr and reel Nevr deezrvd unJusT mrdr ThaT Zero Peepul
Shood Expeerienss uhgehnJusTLee Ohpohzd By ReeL JusT Lahz:
1: torchr and mrdr ahr ( ReeL ObjecTiv bad rongz uhv violating PeepuL
2: Kuz Uv ThaT, torchr and mrdr ahr RyTLee Ohpohzd AT LeesT By Thuh Follieeng:


Evil Bad Rong ( ProCrucifixionIsm = proh croosifikshuhn izm ) Iz Thuh Main Probblem!!!

Ainchent Roman Empire Frst ThoT And Implemmented unJust Croosi9fikshuhn Az wuhn Uhv Thuh WrsT Kynds Uhv Mrdr Evr Implemented.


AnTy Pauline substittooshun punishment In TruhdishuhnuL EengGLish

Wrd subsTiTTooshun Nohrm rong speld s-u-b-s—i-t-u-t-i-o-n.

THe Christian unJust Unfair doctrin Heer SimpLifyd Fohr KLehriTTee az "substihttooshun punishment" wuhz authrd by mass-murderer saul uhv Tarsus

Iesous Nevr ToT unJusT "substittooshunn punishment".

Sum Nazzuhreens Teech Iesous ToT "I am come to abolish the sacrifices" Az ToT AT: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gospel_of_the_Ebionites

Saul of Tarsus tot that innuhsent Iesous shood hav got put on a kruusiffiks and ( tohrchrd = rep kozd bad bad rong rong wrsehneeng hiz bad mohral suffreeng ) til he wuhz mrdrd az substittuushuhn fohr dif UhThr Heewman'z suhpohzd rongz ThaT MohsT Uhv Thuh Tym ahr less than { krym dehskrybd az deelibrat mrdr uhv non deelibrat-mrdrur }, Thus non-wrthee uhv deth.

rongd Gy Hoo Wuz AfTr Hiz BrTh Naeemd In Matt1 Ἰησοῦς then In Luke1 Ἰησοῦν

InnuhsenT Iesous Non-deezrvd deth

InnuhsenT Iesous Non-deezrvd deth by killeeng, espeshuLLee Non veeuh kruusihfikshuhn that iz torchr vyohLaeeshuhn eewwzeeng a kruusiffix-torchr-wehpuhn with gohl tu uhkomplish mrdr Krym.

Iesous Wuz ToT Tu Bee Uh HeeLr Huu DyrekTLee Kozd ReeLeef Frŭm sufreeng ŭv lots ŭv kyndz And Huu Nevr Torchrd EHnee Heewman Nor Ennee AnnimmuL, EksepT Wuhn Day maybe Tu A Donkey BeesT WyL Rydeeng ITs Bak Thoh Thuh Donkey Non-dyd, Thus Iesous Nevr Deezrvd SpessiffikuLLee tohrchr till mrdrd.

InnuhsenT Iesous Wuhz Jujd By Thuh Guhvrnur PiLaTe And Non-SuspecTed Uhv Az Mehnee Az Wuhn Krym.

Iesous Wuhz SpessiffikLee non-pruuvd giltee uhv mrdr, Thus Non-Deesrvd Tu get kild.

Thus Iesous' deth shood ohnLee GeT ThoT Uhv ohnLee az An Unjust mrdr.

Truu Justiss Wood Bee If I Kood Go Bak In Tym Tu Beefohr Thuh Kruusiffikshuhn Uhv Iesous And Gahrd Iesous Fruhm Getteeng Kruusiffyd.

Then, Zeeroh Peepul Wood Theenk

  • ThaT " It wuhz reekwyrd for Iesous Tu hav been Kruusiffyd ".

Pleez Heer YouTube Vid Naeemd " Crucifixion Is Unjust "

  • In Wich It Iz Said, "Thuh gravest unjustice is to punish Thuh 1 Huu Did NoT Commit Thuh Sin."

Az This AhThr Haz Tryd Tu AkT Az Good Fair JusT PehrenT,

& I Hav Nevr InTenchuhnuLLee DeeLibraTLee kozd Wuhn Uhv My DahTrz Tu fizzikkuLLee Body sduffer.

(az a punishment fohr az mehnee az Wuhn Uhv Thuh UhThr DoTr'z rong ThoTs Ohr AkTs.

I Theenhk I Hav ( BeTr = Mohr Good Ohr And|Ohr Less Bad ) Moral EThiks

Than mass-murdeerer saul of Tarsus and his delusional unfair unjust "substitution punishment" he tot tu humans.

Gy saul uhv tarsus tot the delusional idea that the EThikLee unJust nonLegal torchr mrdr croosiffikshuhn rong uhv InnuhsenT Ieaous can't koz JusTiss Fohr Mee Ohr Ehnee UhThr JusT Fair Mynd.

illegal Meenz Noh Suhspishuhn ThaT Iesous committed mrdr Thus No CourT TriaL And Prooveeng mrdr )

unJusT Duz _No Wuhn Proovd Iesous giLtee uhv kuhmiTTeeng mrdr ) Thus No Basis For Being JuhsTLee kild
rong Kuz:the torchr aspect uhv croosiffikshuhn iz ahlwayz rong
and it iz a mudr rong kuz Iesous Wuz InvesTigaeeTed By Thuh GuvrnmenT OhfishuL And Found InnuhsenT Uhv ehnee crime, Inkloodeeng And EspeshuLLee mrdr.

unJusTiss for InnuhsenT Ieaous can't koz JusTiss Fohr Mee Ohr Ehnee UhThr JusT Fair Mynd.

Iesous Nevr ToT "Heewman substitution punishment"

Sum Nazareens Teech Iesous ToT ""I am come to abolish the sacrifices"

KwohTFruhm: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gospel_of_the_Ebionites


IT Wuz And Iz And Evr Shall Bee unJusT "Substitution puinshment" rong uhgehnst An InnuhsenT Heewman Naemd Iesou Iesous.

Thuh Heebroo Israelites Nevr ToT Ohr PrakTisT substutooshun punishment veeuh cruciffikshuhn
)
In Thuh GospeLz Iesou Wuz Found ( InnuhsenT = Non-Proovd guilty uhv ( mrdr = Murder ) ) Iesou Iesous crucified )ohr ( AfTr GospeL should hav ggt cruciffied ) for eEhnee Dif Heewman'z giltee akt tu dooo ehnee kynd uhv sin in thuh [ prtestant 66 books called Lesr canon Mynd cage ) Ohr ( the original anastasius canon that later was taught by the vatican ists ) ohr ( the orthodox study bible AT http://worldhistory.biz/download567/The_Orthodox_Study_Bible_-_St.pdf ) canon of the [ orthodox catholi church]including the 72 book greek septuagint .


IT Wuz And IzAnd Evr Shall Bee unJusT "Substitution puinshment" rong that An InnuhsenT Heewman ( Pree-GospeL should hav planed to get crucified ) ohr (d ureeng GospeL should despite Found ( InnuhsenT = Non-Proovd guilty uhv ( mrdr = Murder ) ) bee crucified )ohr ( AfTr GospeL should hav ggt cruciffied ) for eEhnee Dif Heewman'z giltee akt tu dooo ehnee kynd uhv sin in thuh [ prtestant 66 books called Lesr canon Mynd cage ) Ohr ( the original anastasius canon that later was taught by the vatican ists ) ohr ( the orthodox study bible AT http://worldhistory.biz/download567/The_Orthodox_Study_Bible_-_St.pdf ) canon of the [ orthodox catholic church] including the 72 book greek septuagint .

https://www.theopedia.com/greek-and-hebrew-words-for-sin



"Anti Pauline Substitution PunishmenT"

THe Christian unJust Unfair doctrin Heer SimpLifyd Fohr KLehriTTee az "substitution punishment" wuhzauthrd by mass-murderer saul of tarsus.
Iesous Nevr ToT unJusT "substitution punishment".

Sum Nazzuhreens Teech esous ToT ""I am come to abolish the sacrifices"

rongd Gy Hoo Wuz AfTr Hiz BrTh Naeemd In Matt1 Ἰησοῦς then In Luke1 Ἰησοῦν

Saul of t=arsus tot that wuhn Heewman RehrLee Uhdopted Thoh SumTymz uhsoomd tu bee a ChyLd Uhv God shood get ( torchrd = rep kozd bad rong suffreeng to )
Fohr tHuh Disobedience uhv dif UhThr uhsoomd Heewman Children Uhv God.

Az A Try Tu Be Good Fair JusT PehrenT,

& I Hav Nevr InTenchuhnuLLee DeeLibraTLee kozd Wuhn Uhv My DoTrz Tu BizzikkuLLee Body sufr
* az a punishment fohr az mehnee az wuhn uhv Thuh UhThr DoTr'z rong ThoTs Ohr AkTs.

I Theenhk I Hav ( BeTr = Mohr Good Ohr And|Ohr Less Bad ) Moral EThiks

Than mass-murdeerer saul of tarsus and his delusional unfair unjust "substitution punishment" tu humans.

Gy saul uhv tarsus tot the delusional idea that the EThikLee unJust nonLegal torchr mrdr croosiffikshuhn rong uhv InnuhsenT Ieaous can't koz JusTiss Fohr Mee Ohr Ehnee UhThr JusT Fair Mynd.

illegal Meenz Noh Suhspishuhn ThaT Iesous committed mrdr Thus No CourT TriaL And Prooveeng mrdr )

  • unJusT Duz _No Wuhn Proovd Iesous giLtee uhv kuhmiTTeeng mrdr ) Thus No Basis For Being JuhsTLee kild
  • rong Kuz:the torchr aspect uhv croosiffikshuhn iz ahlwayz rong
    • and it iz a mudr rong kuz Iesous Wuz InvesTigaeeTed By Thuh GuvrnmenT OhfishuL And Found InnuhsenT Uhv ehnee crime, Inkloodeeng And EspeshuLLee mrdr.

unJusTiss for InnuhsenT Ieaous can't koz JusTiss Fohr Mee Ohr Ehnee UhThr JusT Fair Mynd.


Iesous Nevr ToT "Heewman substitution punishment"

FacT: croosifikshuhn-rongd-Gy-BrTh-Naymd-Ieeous-In-Matt1

Sum Nazareens Teech Iesous ToT ""I am come to abolish the sacrifices"


Thuh NeksT TekST Wuhz Fruhm:

Apperently obeying sum ryteeng by suhm non lrnd ahthr,

( ( Muslim = surrendered ) peeple are taught that "crucifixion should be practiced as capital punishment", primarily against christians probbubLee kuz christians teech unJusT Pro croosiffikshuhn izm fohr InnuhsenT Iesous.

Crucifixion is still a part of Iran's criminal code, and as a method of torture and execution is still being used, primarily against Christians and Christian converts, in Sudan and Iraq, both Islamic countries.


ReesehnT Kruusiffikshuhnz ThaT Shood Hav Ben Nonlegal


Thuh NexT TexT Wuhz Fruhm:

Most of us think of crucifixion as ancient history – a gruesome execution method practiced by the Romans and other long-ago cultures – with Jesus Christ its most famous victim. But crucifixion, though rare, has continued into the modern day – as a devotional practice among fervent Christians, as a tool of terror, even as performance art.

-=----

Thuh NexT TexT Wuhz Fruhm:

8 Gruesome Stories of Modern Day Crucifixions

-=----

Thuh NexT TexT Wuhz Fruhm:

Crucifixion: It’s Not Ancient History Anymore
ISIS has revived the barbaric practice. The time to stop both of them is now.


Wuhn ReesehnT Lrnd UhbowT Modrn atrocity simmilr tu a kroosiffikshuhn Wuhz menchuhnd AT:

Saudi Arabia beheaded a man Wednesday in Mecca, then put his body on public display, for allegedly stabbing a woman to death. The method of punishment is known in Saudi Arabia as a crucifixion, which the government says is sanctioned by Islamic law, and is reserved for only the most severe crimes in the kingdom…

But as recently as 2013, Amnesty International reported that Saudi authorities executed and crucified five Yemenis in the city of Jizan after they were found guilty of armed robbery and the murder of a Saudi man…

…Crucifixion, though rarer, is endorsed in the Koran in Sura 5:33-34:

Those who wage war against God and His Messenger and strive to spread corruption in the land should be punished by death, crucifixion, the amputation of an alternate hand and foot or banishment from the land: a disgrace for them in this world, and then a terrible punishment in the Hereafter, unless they repent before you overpower them: in that case bear in mind that God is forgiving and merciful.


GLobaL CiviLizing ShouLd ILLeegaLize Crucifixion

GLohBuL SihvihLyzeeng Shood ILLeeguLyz Kruusiffikshuhn

* Uhv AnTi eech display uhv kruusiffikss shaeep
* Uhv Wy PrakTiss UhgehnsT PuT OwT SmahL T

1: PeepuL On Ehnee PLaneT Uv Thuh Tranz FynyT Numbr Uhv PLaneTs

  • In Thuh EeTrnuL And Tranz FynyT 3 DimmenshuhnuL Omnivrss,
    • Sum Uv Thohz PeepuL On ThaT PLaneT MyT Sum Tym lrn
      • thuh troo bad rong ( crucifixion spohk az kruusiffikshuhn ) vyohlaeeshuhn process
        • dehskrybd az eewwz evil ( crucifix spphk az kruusiffiks )

1: az tohrchr wehpuhm in wut Iz Now KahLd tohrchr krym and
2: az mrdr wehpuhn with prpuhss tu uhkomplish wut Iz Now KahLd mrdr krym.

2. EevenchoouLeee Thuh EvuLooshun Uv Proh GLohbuL SivviLyzeeng Peewrificaeeshuhn Twohrdz Uh Peer Good JusT SivviLyzeayshuhn Shood DevveLuhp ( IntrnashuhnuL Then GlohbuL ) AnTi Tohrcr Krym Lahz And AnTi Mrdr Krym Lahz.

3. This Prohvydz Thuh Baysis Fohr ( InTrnashuhnul AnTi Kruusiffikshuhn Krym Lahz Then GlohbuL AnTi Kruusiffikshuhn Krym Lahz Tu STop And Preevent kruusiffikshun Fohr ( Ehnee And Ehvree ) Prsun On ThaT GLohb.


InTrnashuhnul AnTi Kruusiffikshuhn Krym Lahz Uhv AnTi Kruusiffikshuhn Izm

InTrnashuhnul Lah Torchr Mrdr Krymz Uhgehnst Heewmannittee


Table of Contents

Thuh NexT TexT Wuhz Frum:

Fruhm Payjez 4 & 5

Article 7. Crimes against humanity

1. For the purpose of this Statute, "crime against humanity" means any of the follow-ing acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack;

(a) Murder;

(e) Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of funda-mental rules of international law;

(f) Torture;

2. For the purpose of paragraph 1:

(a) "Attack directed against any civilian population" means a course of conduct in-volving the multiple commission of acts referred to in paragraph 1 against any civilian pop-ulation, pursuant to or in furtherance of a State or organizational policy to commit such attack;

(e) "Torture", means the intentional infliction of severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, upon a person in the custody or under the control of the accused; except that torture shall not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidentalto, lawful sanctions;

Fruhm Payj 5 & 8

Article 8. War crimes

1. The Court shall have jurisdiction in respect of war crimes in particular when com-mitted as part of a plan or policy or as part of a large-scale commission of such crimes.

2. For the purpose of this Statute, "war crimes" means:

(a) Grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, namely, any of the following acts against persons or property protected under the provisions of the relevant Geneva Convention:

(i) Wilful killing;

(ii) Torture or inhuman treatment, including biological experiments;

(c) In the case of an armed conflict not of an international character, serious violationsof article 3 common to the four Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, namely, any of the following acts committed against persons taking no active part in the hostilities, includ-ing members of armed forces who have laid down their arms and those placed hors de com-bat by sickness, wounds, detention or any other cause:

(i) Violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds, mutilation, crueltreatment and torture

Fruhm Payj 31:

Article 55. Rights of persons during an investigation1. In respect of an investigation under this Statute, a person:

(a) Shall not be compelled to incriminate himself or herself or to confess guilt;

(b) Shall not be subjected to any form of coercion, duress or threat, to torture or to anyother form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment;


Thuh NexT TexT Wuhz Frum:

Crimes against humanity under international law

Crimes against humanity appeared for the first time in a treaty in the 1945 Nuremberg Charter at the end of the Second World War, albeit with a different definition than today.

Since the 1990s, crimes against humanity have been codified in different international treaties such as the Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (1993), the Statute of the International Tribunal for Rwanda (1994) and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (1998). The Rome Statute provides the most recent and most expansive list of specific criminal acts that may constitute crimes against humanity.

Unlike other human rights violations, war crimes do not engage State responsibility but individual criminal responsibility. This means that individuals can be tried and found personally responsible for these crimes.

Prohibited acts include:

Murder

Extermination
Enslavement
Deportation or forcible transfer of population
Imprisonment

Torture

Sexual violence
Persecution against an identifiable group
Enforced disappearance of persons
The crime of apartheid
Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health


Thuh NexT TexT Wuhz Frum:

international criminal law

Crime against humanity

Written By: Richard Vernon

Crime against humanity, an offense in international criminal law, adopted in the Charter of the International Military Tribunal (Nürnberg Charter), which tried surviving Nazi leaders in 1945, and was, in 1998, incorporated into the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC).

Crimes against humanity

consist of various acts—murder, extermination, enslavement, **torture**,

forcible transfers of populations, imprisonment, rape, persecution, enforced disappearance, and apartheid, among others—when, according to the ICC , those are “committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population.”


participated in murder and torture and rape

found guilty of a crime against humanity for his rape, torture, and murder

Thuh NexT TexT Wuhz Frum:

Mr. Semanza was a former mayor of Bicumbi commune, and was accused of aiding and abetting genocide in connection with two massacres of Tutsis. He was specifically alleged to have directly participated in murder and torture, and for inciting a crowd to rape Tutsi women prior to killing them, and to have personally participated in the same. The Trial Chamber found that Mr. Semanza was guilty of a crime against humanity for his rape, torture, and murder of Tutsi women..


Included page "glohbul-anty-croosiffikshun-krym-lahz" does not exist (create it now)


WuT Iz Thuh Reezuhn Fohr THuh Omnyon Izm AhThr PrakTiss Uhv

Wy PrakTiss UhgehnsT PuT OwT SmahL T

* EksepT Wen Deskrybeeng ObjekTiv VyoLaeeshuhn Krymz Such Az Thohz AT
* Peeuur JusT WohrehnTs Fohr Srch AkTs And UhrehsTs?

Kuz:
1: A SmahL T haz an uhpeeranss sihmilr Tu uh ( kruusiffikss Nohrm SpeLd Crucifix ) and
2: This AhThr Iz AnTi eech display uhv kruusiffikss shaeep.

AnTi eech display uhv kruusiffikss shaeep

Thuh AhThr Iz AnTi eech display uhv kruusiffikss shaeep Kuhz THis AhThr Iz A DeeLihburaT AnTi Kruusiffikshuhn Izm IsT.

Showeeng a kruusiffikss can giv an uhbzrvr a rong-reppeewtaeeshun uv beeyeeng
ronglee-pro the wrst-bad-rong unJUSTness uv ( crucifixion spohk az kruusihfikshuhn ), EeuuzhuuaLee in 100% unFair 100% nonJusTiss Fohr InnuhsenT Iesous.


InnuhsenT Iesous Non-deezrvd deth

InnuhsenT Iesous Non-deezrvd deth by killeeng, espeshuLLee Non veeuh kruusihfikshuhn that iz torchr vyohLaeeshuhn eewwzeeng a kruusiffix-torchr-wehpuhn with gohl tu uhkomplish mrdr Krym.

Iesous Wuz ToT Tu Bee Uh HeeLr Huu DyrekTLee Kozd ReeLeef Frŭm sufreeng ŭv lots ŭv kyndz And Huu Nevr Torchrd EHnee Heewman Nor Ennee AnnimmuL, EksepT Wuhn Day maybe Tu A Donkey BeesT WyL Rydeeng ITs Bak Thoh Thuh Donkey Non-dyd, Thus Iesous Nevr Deezrvd SpessiffikuLLee tohrchr till mrdrd.

InnuhsenT Iesous Wuhz Jujd By Thuh Guhvrnur PiLaTe And Non-SuspecTed Uhv Az Mehnee Az Wuhn Krym.

Iesous Wuhz SpessiffikLee non-pruuvd giltee uhv mrdr, Thus Non-Deesrvd Tu get kild.

Thus Iesous' deth shood ohnLee GeT ThoT Uhv ohnLee az An Unjust mrdr.

Truu Justiss Wood Bee If I Kood Go Bak In Tym Tu Beefohr Thuh Kruusiffikshuhn Uhv Iesous And Gahrd Iesous Fruhm Getteeng Kruusiffyd.

Then, Zeeroh Peepul Wood Theenk

  • ThaT " It wuhz reekwyrd for Iesous Tu hav been Kruusiffyd ".

Pleez Heer YouTube Vid Naeemd " Crucifixion Is Unjust "

  • In Wich It Iz Said, "Thuh gravest unjustice is to punish Thuh 1 Huu Did NoT Commit Thuh Sin."

Thuh AhThr Iz Uh DeeLibrehT ( AnTicrucifixionism = AnTi Kruusiffikshuhn Izm ) IsT.

This Paydj Iz Pro VoLLuhnTehree OpshuhnuL DeeLibreT AnTi-SmahL-T PrakTiss:
1: AnTi SmahL T PuT OwT By DeeLibrehTLee RyTeeng and Typeeng OhnLee Big T'z;
2: SmaHL T Kunvrzhun Tu Big T PrakTiss__**, Fohr EgzampuL Eeuuzeeng Uh Wrd Procesr [ Find And Reeplace ] Fuhnkshuhn Ohr Thuh EekwihvuhLenT Srviss AT: https://www.browserling.com/tools/text-replace

Theez Ahr Duhn Fohr Thuh Sayk Uhv Thuh Troo UhbjekTiv JusTiss Uv AnTy Croosiffikshuhn Izm.


ReesehnT Kruusiffikshuhnz ThaT Shood Hav Ben Nonlegal


Thuh NexT TexT Wuhz Fruhm:

Most of us think of crucifixion as ancient history – a gruesome execution method practiced by the Romans and other long-ago cultures – with Jesus Christ its most famous victim. But crucifixion, though rare, has continued into the modern day – as a devotional practice among fervent Christians, as a tool of terror, even as performance art.

-=----

Thuh NexT TexT Wuhz Fruhm:

8 Gruesome Stories of Modern Day Crucifixions

-=----

Thuh NexT TexT Wuhz Fruhm:

Crucifixion: It’s Not Ancient History Anymore
ISIS has revived the barbaric practice. The time to stop both of them is now.


Wuhn ReesehnT Lrnd UhbowT Modrn atrocity simmilr tu a kroosiffikshuhn Wuhz menchuhnd AT:

Saudi Arabia beheaded a man Wednesday in Mecca, then put his body on public display, for allegedly stabbing a woman to death. The method of punishment is known in Saudi Arabia as a crucifixion, which the government says is sanctioned by Islamic law, and is reserved for only the most severe crimes in the kingdom…

But as recently as 2013, Amnesty International reported that Saudi authorities executed and crucified five Yemenis in the city of Jizan after they were found guilty of armed robbery and the murder of a Saudi man…

…Crucifixion, though rarer, is endorsed in the Koran in Sura 5:33-34:

Those who wage war against God and His Messenger and strive to spread corruption in the land should be punished by death, crucifixion, the amputation of an alternate hand and foot or banishment from the land: a disgrace for them in this world, and then a terrible punishment in the Hereafter, unless they repent before you overpower them: in that case bear in mind that God is forgiving and merciful.


GLobaL CiviLizing ShouLd ILLeegaLize Crucifixion

GLohBuL SihvihLyzeeng Shood ILLeeguLyz Kruusiffikshuhn

* Uhv AnTi eech display uhv kruusiffikss shaeep
* Uhv Wy PrakTiss UhgehnsT PuT OwT SmahL T

1: PeepuL On Ehnee PLaneT Uv Thuh Tranz FynyT Numbr Uhv PLaneTs

  • In Thuh EeTrnuL And Tranz FynyT 3 DimmenshuhnuL Omnivrss,
    • Sum Uv Thohz PeepuL On ThaT PLaneT MyT Sum Tym lrn
      • thuh troo bad rong ( crucifixion spohk az kruusiffikshuhn ) vyohlaeeshuhn process
        • dehskrybd az eewwz evil ( crucifix spphk az kruusiffiks )

1: az tohrchr wehpuhm in wut Iz Now KahLd tohrchr krym and
2: az mrdr wehpuhn with prpuhss tu uhkomplish wut Iz Now KahLd mrdr krym.

2. EevenchoouLeee Thuh EvuLooshun Uv Proh GLohbuL SivviLyzeeng Peewrificaeeshuhn Twohrdz Uh Peer Good JusT SivviLyzeayshuhn Shood DevveLuhp ( IntrnashuhnuL Then GlohbuL ) AnTi Tohrcr Krym Lahz And AnTi Mrdr Krym Lahz.

3. This Prohvydz Thuh Baysis Fohr ( InTrnashuhnul AnTi Kruusiffikshuhn Krym Lahz Then GlohbuL AnTi Kruusiffikshuhn Krym Lahz Tu STop And Preevent kruusiffikshun Fohr ( Ehnee And Ehvree ) Prsun On ThaT GLohb.


InTrnashuhnul AnTi Kruusiffikshuhn Krym Lahz Uhv AnTi Kruusiffikshuhn Izm

InTrnashuhnul Lah Torchr Mrdr Krymz Uhgehnst Heewmannittee


Table of Contents

Thuh NexT TexT Wuhz Frum:

Fruhm Payjez 4 & 5

Article 7. Crimes against humanity

1. For the purpose of this Statute, "crime against humanity" means any of the follow-ing acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack;

(a) Murder;

(e) Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of funda-mental rules of international law;

(f) Torture;

2. For the purpose of paragraph 1:

(a) "Attack directed against any civilian population" means a course of conduct in-volving the multiple commission of acts referred to in paragraph 1 against any civilian pop-ulation, pursuant to or in furtherance of a State or organizational policy to commit such attack;

(e) "Torture", means the intentional infliction of severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, upon a person in the custody or under the control of the accused; except that torture shall not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidentalto, lawful sanctions;

Fruhm Payj 5 & 8

Article 8. War crimes

1. The Court shall have jurisdiction in respect of war crimes in particular when com-mitted as part of a plan or policy or as part of a large-scale commission of such crimes.

2. For the purpose of this Statute, "war crimes" means:

(a) Grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, namely, any of the following acts against persons or property protected under the provisions of the relevant Geneva Convention:

(i) Wilful killing;

(ii) Torture or inhuman treatment, including biological experiments;

(c) In the case of an armed conflict not of an international character, serious violationsof article 3 common to the four Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, namely, any of the following acts committed against persons taking no active part in the hostilities, includ-ing members of armed forces who have laid down their arms and those placed hors de com-bat by sickness, wounds, detention or any other cause:

(i) Violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds, mutilation, crueltreatment and torture

Fruhm Payj 31:

Article 55. Rights of persons during an investigation1. In respect of an investigation under this Statute, a person:

(a) Shall not be compelled to incriminate himself or herself or to confess guilt;

(b) Shall not be subjected to any form of coercion, duress or threat, to torture or to anyother form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment;


Thuh NexT TexT Wuhz Frum:

Crimes against humanity under international law

Crimes against humanity appeared for the first time in a treaty in the 1945 Nuremberg Charter at the end of the Second World War, albeit with a different definition than today.

Since the 1990s, crimes against humanity have been codified in different international treaties such as the Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (1993), the Statute of the International Tribunal for Rwanda (1994) and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (1998). The Rome Statute provides the most recent and most expansive list of specific criminal acts that may constitute crimes against humanity.

Unlike other human rights violations, war crimes do not engage State responsibility but individual criminal responsibility. This means that individuals can be tried and found personally responsible for these crimes.

Prohibited acts include:

Murder

Extermination
Enslavement
Deportation or forcible transfer of population
Imprisonment

Torture

Sexual violence
Persecution against an identifiable group
Enforced disappearance of persons
The crime of apartheid
Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health


Thuh NexT TexT Wuhz Frum:

international criminal law

Crime against humanity

Written By: Richard Vernon

Crime against humanity, an offense in international criminal law, adopted in the Charter of the International Military Tribunal (Nürnberg Charter), which tried surviving Nazi leaders in 1945, and was, in 1998, incorporated into the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC).

Crimes against humanity

consist of various acts—murder, extermination, enslavement, **torture**,

forcible transfers of populations, imprisonment, rape, persecution, enforced disappearance, and apartheid, among others—when, according to the ICC , those are “committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population.”


participated in murder and torture and rape

found guilty of a crime against humanity for his rape, torture, and murder

Thuh NexT TexT Wuhz Frum:

Mr. Semanza was a former mayor of Bicumbi commune, and was accused of aiding and abetting genocide in connection with two massacres of Tutsis. He was specifically alleged to have directly participated in murder and torture, and for inciting a crowd to rape Tutsi women prior to killing them, and to have personally participated in the same. The Trial Chamber found that Mr. Semanza was guilty of a crime against humanity for his rape, torture, and murder of Tutsi women..


See AhLsoh:


Intrnashuhnuhl Lah Syzohmz


WrLd Fed Lah Saiz Ohmz


WrLd GuvrnmenT


Lesr Kreaytrz


GrayTr KreeayTrz